• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌牙槽骨种植体初始愈合过程中分形维数、Feret 直径和空隙度的变化。

Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants.

机构信息

Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1009-13.

PMID:23057012
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the combination of fractal dimension (FD), lacunarity, and Feret diameter (FeD) to quantitatively characterize structural changes of mandibular alveolar bone around dental implants during initial healing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three standard-sized regions of interest (ROIs) (mesial and distal crest and apical area) around implants and three ROIs of the same size in the alveolar bone on the contralateral side were analyzed on digital panoramic images. FD was calculated using the box-counting method, and lacunarity was calculated using the FracLac plugin of Image J software. FeD was measured in the same ROIs. Comparisons of the groups were done with the Dunnett test.

RESULTS

Forty-two implants in the posterior mandibles of 21 patients were used for FD measurements. A total of 189 ROIs was segmented into binary images. Mean FD values for mesial, distal, and apical ROIs around implants were 1.26, 1.36, and 1.4, respectively. The mean FD of alveolar bone around premolars/molars was 1.39 for all ROIs. The mean FeD for mesial, distal, and apical ROIs around implants was 7.63, 7.86, and 8.02, respectively, whereas it ranged between 7.88 and 8.13 for premolar teeth. Mean lacunarity values for mesial, distal, and apical ROIs around implants were 0.53, 0.51, and 0.48, respectively. Lacunarity values for ROIs around premolars ranged between 0.45 and 0.50. No significant differences were observed in FD, FeD, or lacunarity measurements between ROIs around implants and around teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

The satisfactory healing of bone following implant placement may be monitored by calculating FD, lacunarity, and FeD using digital panoramic images. Although preliminary, these values may alert the practitioner to any implants with loss of stability.

摘要

目的

评估分形维数(FD)、空隙度和 Feret 直径(FeD)的组合,以定量描述种植体周围下颌牙槽骨在初始愈合过程中的结构变化。

材料和方法

在数字化全景图像上分析种植体周围的三个标准感兴趣区域(ROI)(近中和远中嵴和根尖区)和对侧牙槽骨中相同大小的三个 ROI。使用盒计数法计算 FD,使用 Image J 软件的 FracLac 插件计算空隙度。在相同的 ROI 中测量 FeD。使用 Dunnett 检验进行组间比较。

结果

21 名患者的 42 个后下颌种植体用于 FD 测量。共分割 189 个 ROI 成二进制图像。种植体周围近中、远中和根尖 ROI 的平均 FD 值分别为 1.26、1.36 和 1.4。所有 ROI 中,前磨牙/磨牙周围牙槽骨的平均 FD 值为 1.39。种植体周围近中、远中和根尖 ROI 的平均 FeD 分别为 7.63、7.86 和 8.02,而前磨牙的范围在 7.88 至 8.13 之间。种植体周围近中、远中和根尖 ROI 的平均空隙度值分别为 0.53、0.51 和 0.48,而前磨牙周围 ROI 的空隙度值在 0.45 至 0.50 之间。种植体周围 ROI 与牙齿周围 ROI 的 FD、FeD 或空隙度测量值无显著差异。

结论

使用数字化全景图像计算 FD、空隙度和 FeD 可以监测种植体植入后骨的愈合情况。尽管初步研究,但这些值可能会提醒医生注意任何稳定性丧失的种植体。

相似文献

1
Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants.下颌牙槽骨种植体初始愈合过程中分形维数、Feret 直径和空隙度的变化。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1009-13.
2
Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs.牙科X光片的分形维数与孔隙率分析
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Sep;34(5):261-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85149245.
3
Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity Analysis in the Dentulous and Edentulous Mandibular Posterior Region Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-sectional Retrospective Study.应用锥形束 CT 对有牙和无牙下颌后区进行分形维数和空隙度分析:一项横截面回顾性研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Jun 1;25(6):581-587. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3701.
4
Correlation of Fractal Dimension Values with Implant Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Values at Implant Recipient Sites.种植体植入部位的分形维数值与种植体植入扭矩及共振频率值的相关性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):55-62. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3965. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs.使用全景X线片进行分形分析以评估种植体周围牙槽骨小梁
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):519-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1245-y. Epub 2014 May 7.
6
Radiographic Fractal and Clinical Resonance Frequency Analyses of Posterior Mandibular Dental Implants: Their Possible Association With Mandibular Cortical Index With 12-Month Follow-up.下颌后牙种植体的影像学分形分析与临床共振频率分析:与下颌皮质指数的可能关联及12个月随访
Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;25(6):789-795. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000496.
7
Evaluation of change in trabecular bone structure surrounding dental implants by fractal dimension analysis and comparison with radiomorphometric indicators: a retrospective study.基于分形维数分析评估种植体周围小梁骨结构的变化,并与放射形态计量学指标进行比较:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 22;10:e13145. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13145. eCollection 2022.
8
Mandibular bone changes in sickle cell anemia: fractal analysis.镰状细胞贫血患者下颌骨的变化:分形分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):e41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.007.
9
Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of mandibular bone on digital panoramic radiographs of tobacco users.烟草使用者数字化全景X线片下颌骨的分形维数和孔隙率分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021 Spring;15(2):140-146. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.024. Epub 2021 May 5.
10
Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.使用分形维数、骨面积分数和灰度值评估下颌骨小梁模式:锥形束 CT 与全景片的比较。
Oral Radiol. 2019 Jan;35(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11282-018-0316-1. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of graft osteogenesis using fractal dimension analysis on cone-beam computed tomography images following maxillary sinus lift surgery.在上颌窦提升术后的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像上使用分形维分析评估移植骨成骨情况。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1346. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06695-8.
2
Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone area fraction analysis of peri-implant trabecular bone after prosthodontic loading.义齿修复加载后种植体周围松质骨的分形维数、孔隙度和骨面积分数分析
Oral Radiol. 2025 Jan;41(1):120-130. doi: 10.1007/s11282-024-00784-0. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
The Suitability of Trabecular Patterns in the Assessment of Dental Implant Osseointegration Process through 2D Digital and 3D CBCT Radiographs.
通过二维数字射线照片和三维锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)射线照片评估牙种植体骨结合过程中骨小梁模式的适用性
Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):571-578. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772570. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Fractal Dimension as a Tool for Assessment of Dental Implant Stability-A Scoping Review.分形维数作为评估牙种植体稳定性的工具——一项综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 13;11(14):4051. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144051.
5
Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review.分形分析在牙科图像中的应用:系统评价。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Feb;49(2):20180457. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180457. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Ionizing radiation and bone quality: time-dependent effects.电离辐射与骨质量:时相关效应。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 22;14(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1219-y.
7
A comparison of four different imaging modalities - Conventional, cross polarized, infra-red and ultra-violet in the assessment of childhood bruising.四种不同成像方式——传统成像、交叉偏振成像、红外成像和紫外成像在儿童瘀伤评估中的比较。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Oct;59:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
8
Bone Texture Fractal Dimension Analysis of Ultrasound-Treated Bone around Implant Site: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial.种植体周围超声处理骨的骨纹理分形维数分析:一项双盲临床试验
Int J Dent. 2018 Apr 15;2018:2672659. doi: 10.1155/2018/2672659. eCollection 2018.