Shanthachol Teerarat, Nilgate Sumanee, Suankratay Chusana
Division of lnfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty ofMedicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1053-8.
There has been a development of automated and continuous-monitoring blood culture systems that are more sensitive than conventional systems for the detection of microorganisms. Whether two or three blood culture specimens obtained during a 24-hour period using these automated systems achieving a higher recovery rate of microorganism remains to be determined. The present study was aimed to compare the recovery rates of microorganism of blood-stream infections (BSIs) using two and three blood culture specimens.
A prospective investigator-blinded study was carried out in patients who needed to have blood cultures in medicine wards and intensive care units as well as an emergency room of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between October 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Three blood culture specimens were obtained from each patient during a 24-hour period. Each specimen was inoculated into an aerobic bottle of blood culture broth (TREK Diagnostics, Cleveland, OH, US), and then incubated at 37 degrees C for seven days.
Of 568 patients, there were 116 (20.4%) unimicrobial episodes with three blood cultures obtained during a 24-hour period. There were 70 (12.3%) and 46 (8.1%) episodes of true pathogen and contaminant, respectively. The recovery rates of true pathogen were 75.7% (53 isolates), 87.1% (61 isolates), and 100% (70 isolates) with the first, second, and third blood culture specimens, respectively (p < 0.05 between the recovery rate with the first two and the third blood culture specimens). There were 25 (35.7%), 38 (58.6%) isolates, and four (5.7%) of Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi, respectively. Among 25 Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolate (10, 14.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (5, 7.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (3, 10% each). Among 38 Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (13, 18. 6%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8, 11.4%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (6, 8.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of the recovery rate of microorganisms using two blood culture specimens were 85.7% and 92.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the recovery rate of microorganisms using three blood culture specimens were 100% and 90.8%, respectively.
To the best of the authors'knowledge, the present study is the first prospective study to compare the recovery rate of microorganisms of BSIs between the two and three blood culture specimens using the VersaTREK blood culture system. Three blood culture specimens are required to achieve the recovery rate of more than 99%.
已经开发出自动化连续监测血培养系统,其在检测微生物方面比传统系统更敏感。使用这些自动化系统在24小时内采集两份或三份血培养标本是否能实现更高的微生物回收率仍有待确定。本研究旨在比较使用两份和三份血培养标本时血流感染(BSIs)的微生物回收率。
在泰国曼谷朱拉隆功国王纪念医院的内科病房、重症监护病房以及急诊室中,对需要进行血培养的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究者设盲研究,研究时间为2010年10月1日至2011年3月31日。在24小时内从每位患者采集三份血培养标本。每份标本接种到一瓶需氧血培养肉汤(美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰市的TREK诊断公司生产)中,然后在37℃下孵育7天。
在568例患者中,有116例(20.4%)在24小时内采集三份血培养标本时出现单一微生物感染情况。分别有70例(12.3%)和46例(8.1%)为真病原体和污染物感染情况。第一、第二和第三份血培养标本的真病原体回收率分别为75.7%(53株分离菌)、87.1%(61株分离菌)和100%(70株分离菌)(前两份血培养标本与第三份血培养标本的回收率之间p<0.05)。分别有25株(35.7%)、38株(58.6%)和4株(5.7%)革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和真菌分离株。在25株革兰氏阳性菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离菌(10株,14.3%),其次是肺炎链球菌(5株,7.1%)和粪肠球菌、屎肠球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(各3株,10%)。在38株革兰氏阴性菌中,大肠埃希菌是最常见的分离菌(13株,18.6%),其次是铜绿假单胞菌(8株,11.4%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(6株,8.6%)。使用两份血培养标本时微生物回收率的敏感性和特异性分别为85.7%和92.3%。使用三份血培养标本时微生物回收率的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和90.8%。
据作者所知,本研究是第一项使用VersaTREK血培养系统比较两份和三份血培养标本中BSIs微生物回收率的前瞻性研究。需要三份血培养标本才能实现超过99%的回收率。