Treasure C B, Vita J A, Cox D A, Fish R D, Gordon J B, Mudge G H, Colucci W S, Sutton M G, Selwyn A P, Alexander R W
Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Circulation. 1990 Mar;81(3):772-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.3.772.
Dilator reserve of the coronary microvasculature is diminished in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Although increased extravascular compressive forces, tachycardia, and increased myocardial mass can explain some impairment, recent evidence suggests the possibility of intrinsic microvascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation of the microvasculature could be a contributing mechanism. We infused the endothelium-dependent dilator acetylcholine (Ach) (10(-8) to 10(-6) M) and the smooth muscle vasodilator adenosine (AD) (10(-6) to 10(-4) M) into the left anterior descending coronary artery in eight patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (mean ejection fraction, 28%) and seven controls (atypical chest pain). Small vessel resistance was assessed by measuring coronary blood flow (CBF) at constant arterial pressure with a Doppler velocity catheter (corrected for cross-sectional area by angiography). With Ach, control patients increased CBF 232 +/- 40% (mean +/- SEM), whereas CBF did not significantly change in cardiomyopathy patients (41 +/- 24%) (p less than 0.0001, control vs. cardiomyopathy). With AD, control patients increased CBF 422 +/- 56% and cardiomyopathy patients increased CBF 268 +/- 43% (p = 0.13). An index of the proportion of coronary flow reserve attributable to endothelium-dependent vasodilation was obtained by standardizing each patient's Ach dose response to his maximal AD flow response. In seven control patients receiving both Ach and AD, 56 +/- 9% of the maximal AD flow response was attained with the endothelium-dependent vasodilator Ach, whereas in seven cardiomyopathy patients receiving both Ach and AD, only 23 +/- 14% of the maximal AD response was attained (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
扩张型心肌病患者冠状动脉微血管的扩张储备功能降低。尽管血管外压迫力增加、心动过速和心肌质量增加可以解释部分功能损害,但最近的证据表明存在原发性微血管疾病的可能性。我们检验了微血管内皮依赖性舒张功能受损可能是一个促成机制的假设。我们将内皮依赖性舒张剂乙酰胆碱(Ach)(10^(-8)至10^(-6)M)和平滑肌血管舒张剂腺苷(AD)(10^(-6)至10^(-4)M)注入8例扩张型心肌病患者(平均射血分数为28%)和7例对照者(非典型胸痛)的左前降支冠状动脉。通过使用多普勒速度导管在恒定动脉压下测量冠状动脉血流量(CBF)(通过血管造影校正横截面积)来评估小血管阻力。使用Ach时,对照者的CBF增加232±40%(平均值±标准误),而心肌病患者的CBF无显著变化(41±24%)(p<0.0001,对照者与心肌病患者相比)。使用AD时,对照者的CBF增加422±56%,心肌病患者的CBF增加268±43%(p=0.13)。通过将每位患者的Ach剂量反应标准化为其最大AD血流反应,获得了归因于内皮依赖性血管舒张的冠状动脉血流储备比例指数。在7例同时接受Ach和AD的对照者中,内皮依赖性舒张剂Ach达到了最大AD血流反应的56±9%,而在7例同时接受Ach和AD的心肌病患者中,仅达到了最大AD反应的23±14%(p<0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)