Suppr超能文献

听觉系统中的时间处理:来自耳蜗和听觉中脑植入物的见解。

Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

机构信息

Audiology & Deafness Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Feb;14(1):103-24. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0354-z. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

Abstract

Central auditory processing in humans was investigated by comparing the perceptual effects of temporal parameters of electrical stimulation in auditory midbrain implant (AMI) and cochlear implant (CI) users. Four experiments were conducted to measure the following: effect of interpulse intervals on detection thresholds and loudness; temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs); effect of duration on detection thresholds; and forward masking decay. The CI data were consistent with a phenomenological model that based detection or loudness decisions on the output of a sliding temporal integration window, the input to which was the hypothetical auditory nerve response to each stimulus pulse. To predict the AMI data, the model required changes to both the neural response input (i.e., midbrain activity to AMI stimuli, compared to auditory nerve activity to CI stimuli) and the shape of the integration window. AMI data were consistent with a neural response that decreased more steeply compared to CI stimulation as the pulse rate increased or interpulse interval decreased. For one AMI subject, the data were consistent with a significant adaptation of the neural response for rates above 200 Hz. The AMI model required an integration window that was significantly wider (i.e., decreased temporal resolution) than that for CI data, the latter being well fit using the same integration window shape as derived from normal-hearing data. These models provide a useful way to conceptualize how stimulation of central auditory structures differs from stimulation of the auditory nerve and to better understand why AMI users have difficulty processing temporal cues important for speech understanding.

摘要

我们通过比较听觉中脑植入(AMI)和人工耳蜗植入(CI)患者电刺激时间参数的感知效果,研究了人类的中枢听觉处理。进行了四项实验来测量以下内容:脉冲间隔对检测阈值和响度的影响;时调制传递函数(TMTFs);持续时间对检测阈值的影响;以及前向掩蔽衰减。CI 数据与基于滑动时间积分窗口输出的现象学模型一致,该模型的输入是每个刺激脉冲对假设听觉神经反应,该模型基于检测或响度决策。为了预测 AMI 数据,该模型需要对神经反应输入(即 AMI 刺激的中脑活动与 CI 刺激的听觉神经活动相比)和积分窗口的形状进行更改。与 CI 刺激相比,AMI 数据与随着脉冲率增加或脉冲间隔减小而急剧下降的神经反应一致。对于一位 AMI 受试者,数据与神经反应的显著适应一致,该适应在 200Hz 以上的频率下发生。AMI 模型需要一个比 CI 数据更宽的积分窗口(即时间分辨率降低),而后者则使用从正常听力数据中得出的相同积分窗口形状很好地拟合。这些模型提供了一种有用的方法来概念化中枢听觉结构的刺激与听觉神经刺激的不同之处,并更好地理解为什么 AMI 用户难以处理对言语理解很重要的时间线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f35/3540271/f0db726eddf7/10162_2012_354_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验