Institute for Biomechanics, BG Unfallklinik Murnau and PMU Salzburg., James Loeb Str. 7, 82418 Murnau, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jan;133(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1629-x. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
Fractures of the proximal tibia occur very often and are a great challenge for trauma surgeons to stabilize. Although locked nails were developed to stabilize these fractures, this technique has not been sufficiently investigated. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically assess the stability of locked intramedullary nailing compared to locked plating.
16 fresh frozen human cadaveric tibiae were osteotomized in the meta-diaphyseal intersection with an osteotomy gap of 10 mm and a single osteotomy through the medial epicondyle to simulate a 41-C.2 fracture. Stabilization was performed with an angle stable locked Targon-TX nail (n = 8) and two additional canulated screws. The other testing group (n = 8) was treated with two canulated screws and a five-hole LCP-PLT. The bones were tested in a cyclic testing protocol with increasing loads under compression and a load sharing of 60 % through the medial tibial plateau and 40 % to the lateral side. Stiffness and fracture gap movement were measured and failure mode was assessed.
No significant differences were found between the two implants regarding load until failure. The stiffness of the intramedullary nailing group (927 N/mm) was statistically significantly higher than the stiffness of the plating group (564 N/mm). No differences were found for fracture gap movement in the z-axis. However, differences were found for dislocation of the proximal-lateral and proximal-medial fragments, with absolute values of 0.099 mm in the plate group and 0.66 mm in the nailing group at 800 N. Prior to failure, fracture gap movement was 0.22 mm for the plating group and 1.66 mm for the nailing group, a difference that was also statistically significantly different. The nailing group failed by screw cut-out while the plating group failed by screw breakage.
Nailing of proximal tibia fractures leads to a stiffer implant-bone construct than plating. Since no adverse effects were found after nailing it seems to be a good alternative to plating for intra-articular proximal tibia fractures, especially in patients with soft tissue problems.
胫骨近端骨折非常常见,对创伤外科医生来说,稳定这些骨折是一项巨大的挑战。尽管锁定钉的开发是为了稳定这些骨折,但这项技术尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是从生物力学角度评估锁定髓内钉与锁定钢板的稳定性。
16 个新鲜冷冻的人体胫骨标本在骨干-干骺端交界处进行截骨,截骨间隙为 10mm,通过内侧髁单一切口模拟 41-C.2 骨折。用角度稳定锁定 Targon-TX 钉(n=8)和另外 2 个空心螺钉进行固定。另一个测试组(n=8)采用 2 个空心螺钉和 5 孔 LCP-PLT 进行治疗。骨骼在压缩下逐渐增加负荷的循环测试方案中进行测试,通过内侧胫骨平台分担 60%的负荷,通过外侧分担 40%的负荷。测量刚度和骨折间隙运动,并评估失效模式。
两种植入物在失效前的负载没有显著差异。髓内钉组(927N/mm)的刚度明显高于钢板组(564N/mm)。在 z 轴上,骨折间隙运动没有差异。然而,对于近端外侧和近端内侧骨折块的脱位,钢板组的绝对值为 0.099mm,而髓内钉组为 0.66mm,在 800N 时存在差异。失效前,钢板组的骨折间隙运动为 0.22mm,髓内钉组为 1.66mm,差异具有统计学意义。髓内钉组因螺钉切出而失效,而钢板组因螺钉断裂而失效。
胫骨近端骨折的髓内钉固定可产生比钢板固定更坚固的植入物-骨结构。由于髓内钉固定后没有发现不良反应,因此对于关节内胫骨近端骨折,尤其是软组织有问题的患者,它似乎是钢板固定的一种很好的替代方法。