Böhme J, Höch A, Boldt A, Josten C
Klinik für Unfall-, Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Oct;150(5):477-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315270. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
The incidence of pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients increases continuously. Several studies showed that the complexity of injury is often underestimated and a fracture of the posterior pelvic ring not visible with conventional X-rays. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of routine CT on incidence, classification of and therapy for pelvic ring fractures in patients aged over 65 years.
Between 2004 and 2010, 310 elderly patients with a pelvic ring fracture were admitted to a German university level 1 trauma centre. Patients of group 1 (2004-2006) were examined with CT only if a pelvic ring fracture was diagnosed by X-ray and pain in the posterior pelvic ring persisted so that mobilisation was impossible. In group 2 (2007-2010) CT was used for routine examination. Demographic data, injury mechanism and severity (ISS) were documented as well as time and type of diagnostic procedure. Also fracture classification (AO), time and type of treatment were investigated in correlation with total hospital stay.
252 (82 %) patients were female, the median age was 81 years (65-100 years). 228 (74 %) had a low energy trauma, 41 (13 %) a traffic accident and 12 (4 %) had fallen from heights over 3 m. Only in 29 (9 %) cases was no trauma evident. 35 (11 %) patients were injured with an ISS over 16 and classified as polytrauma. The mean ISS was 26.8 ± 11.7. In group 2 the incidence of type A fractures decreased from 64 % to 36 %, whereas the incidence of type B fractures increased from 25 % to 49 % as did isolated sacrum fractures from 1 % to 6 %. Also the indication for operative stabilisation changed in type B fractures from 33 % to 40 % and in isolated sacrum fractures to 71 %. Total hospital stay was between eight and ten days in non-operative and between 20 and 22 days in operative treatment.
A low energy trauma is the major cause of injury for patients of an age over 65 years with a pelvic ring fracture. With the routine CT examination type B fractures and isolated sacrum fractures are seen more often than expected and resulting in a change of treatment procedures.
老年患者骨盆环骨折的发生率持续上升。多项研究表明,损伤的复杂性常常被低估,常规X线检查无法显示的骨盆后环骨折也较为常见。本研究的目的是确定常规CT对65岁以上骨盆环骨折患者的发生率、分类及治疗的影响。
2004年至2010年期间,310例骨盆环骨折的老年患者被收治于德国一所大学一级创伤中心。第1组(2004 - 2006年)患者仅在经X线诊断为骨盆环骨折且骨盆后环疼痛持续以致无法活动时才进行CT检查。第2组(2007 - 2010年)采用CT进行常规检查。记录人口统计学数据、损伤机制和严重程度(损伤严重度评分,ISS)以及诊断程序的时间和类型。还研究了骨折分类(AO)、治疗时间和类型与总住院时间的相关性。
252例(82%)患者为女性,中位年龄为81岁(65 - 100岁)。228例(74%)为低能量创伤,41例(13%)为交通事故伤,12例(4%)从3米以上高处坠落。仅29例(9%)病例未发现明显创伤。35例(11%)患者ISS超过16分,被归类为多发伤。平均ISS为26.8±11.7。在第2组中,A型骨折的发生率从64%降至36%,而B型骨折的发生率从25%升至49%,孤立性骶骨骨折的发生率从1%升至6%。B型骨折手术稳定治疗的指征也从33%变为40%,孤立性骶骨骨折变为71%。非手术治疗的总住院时间为8至10天,手术治疗为20至22天。
低能量创伤是65岁以上骨盆环骨折患者的主要致伤原因。通过常规CT检查,B型骨折和孤立性骶骨骨折的发现比预期更为常见,从而导致治疗方案的改变。