Suppr超能文献

严重骨盆环骨折的影像学评估与分类:来自两家创伤中心 1 级水平的经验。

The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres.

机构信息

Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2013 Oct;95-B(10):1396-401. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.32134.

Abstract

We describe the routine imaging practices of Level 1 trauma centres for patients with severe pelvic ring fractures, and the interobserver reliability of the classification systems of these fractures using plain radiographs and three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstructions. Clinical and imaging data for 187 adult patients (139 men and 48 women, mean age 43 years (15 to 101)) with a severe pelvic ring fracture managed at two Level 1 trauma centres between July 2007 and June 2010 were extracted. Three experienced orthopaedic surgeons classified the plain radiographs and 3D CT reconstruction images of 100 patients using the Tile/AO and Young-Burgess systems. Reliability was compared using kappa statistics. A total of 115 patients (62%) had plain radiographs as well as two-dimensional (2D) CT and 3D CT reconstructions, 52 patients (28%) had plain films only, 12 (6.4%) had 2D and 3D CT reconstructions images only, and eight patients (4.3%) had no available images. The plain radiograph was limited to an anteroposterior pelvic view. Patients without imaging, or only plain films, were more severely injured. A total of 72 patients (39%) were imaged with a pelvic binder in situ. Interobserver reliability for the Tile/AO (Kappa 0.10 to 0.17) and Young-Burgess (Kappa 0.09 to 0.21) was low, and insufficient for clinical and research purposes. Severe pelvic ring fractures are difficult to classify due to their complexity, the increasing use of early treatment such as with pelvic binders, and the absence of imaging altogether in important patient sub-groups, such as those who die early of their injuries.

摘要

我们描述了 1 级创伤中心对严重骨盆环骨折患者的常规影像学检查方法,以及使用平片和三维(3D)CT 重建对这些骨折进行分类的系统的观察者间可靠性。从 2007 年 7 月至 2010 年 6 月,在两个 1 级创伤中心接受治疗的 187 例成人(139 名男性和 48 名女性,平均年龄 43 岁[15-101])严重骨盆环骨折患者的临床和影像学数据被提取出来。3 名经验丰富的骨科医生使用 Tile/AO 和 Young-Burgess 系统对 100 例患者的平片和 3D CT 重建图像进行分类。使用 Kappa 统计比较可靠性。共有 115 例患者(62%)既有平片又有二维(2D)CT 和 3D CT 重建图像,52 例患者(28%)只有平片,12 例患者(6.4%)只有 2D 和 3D CT 重建图像,8 例患者(4.3%)没有可用的图像。平片仅限于前后骨盆视图。没有影像学或只有平片的患者受伤更严重。共有 72 例患者(39%)在原位使用骨盆固定带进行成像。Tile/AO(Kappa 0.10-0.17)和 Young-Burgess(Kappa 0.09-0.21)的观察者间可靠性较低,不适合临床和研究目的。由于骨盆环骨折的复杂性、早期治疗(如骨盆固定带)的使用增加以及重要患者亚组(如早期因伤死亡的患者)完全没有影像学,这些骨折难以分类。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验