Dégano Irene R, Elosua Roberto, Kaski Juan C, Fernández-Bergés Daniel J, Grau María, Marrugat Jaume
Grupo de Investigación de Epidemiología y Genética Cardiovascular, Programa de Investigación de Procesos Inflamatorios y Cardiovasculares, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, España.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Jan;66(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
Differences between European countries in coronary heart disease mortality were initially described in the 20th century, and albeit less dramatic than first reported, these differences remain substantial. Three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain the so-called "Mediterranean paradox": a) underestimation of coronary heart disease mortality due to methodological flaws; b) the "lag time" hypothesis, and c) the traditional Mediterranean diet and lifestyle. In this manuscript we present and discuss another possible explanation for the Mediterranean paradox related to the higher prevalence and and incidence of stable atheromatous plaques in this area.
欧洲国家在冠心病死亡率方面的差异最初在20世纪就有描述,尽管不如首次报道的那么显著,但这些差异仍然很大。为解释所谓的“地中海悖论”,人们提出了三种主要假说:a)由于方法学缺陷导致冠心病死亡率被低估;b)“滞后时间”假说;c)传统的地中海饮食和生活方式。在本手稿中,我们提出并讨论了与该地区稳定动脉粥样硬化斑块的较高患病率和发病率相关的对地中海悖论的另一种可能解释。