Lefkowith J, Schreiner G, Cormier J, Handler E S, Driscoll H K, Greiner D, Mordes J P, Rossini A A
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
J Exp Med. 1990 Mar 1;171(3):729-43. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.3.729.
Essential fatty acid (EFA) deficiency exerts a striking protective effect in several animal models of autoimmune disease. We now report that EFA deprivation prevents diabetes in the BB rat, an animal model of human insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. In diabetes-prone (DP)-BB rats, the incidences of spontaneous diabetes and insulitis (the pathological substrate of autoimmune diabetes) were greatly reduced by EFA deficiency. This beneficial effect of the deficiency state was also seen in diabetes-resistant (DR)-BB rats that, after treatment with antibody to eliminate RT6+ T cells, would otherwise have become diabetic. The susceptibility of EFA-deprived DP-BB rats to spontaneous diabetes was restored when they were given dietary supplements of linoleate at 70 d of age (during the usual period of susceptibility), but not when they were repleted beginning at 120 d (after the peak incidence of diabetes). EFA deficiency did lead to growth retardation, but calorically restricted control rats demonstrated that the protective effect of the deficiency state was not a function of decreased weight. To examine the relationship between the biochemical changes of EFA deficiency and its physiological effects in this system, we compared the fatty acid changes that occurred in EFA-deficient animals that did and did not develop diabetes. Nondiabetic animals had significantly lower levels of (n-6) fatty acids (i.e., linoleate and arachidonate) and higher levels of oleate, an (n-9) fatty acid, than did diabetic animals. Levels of 20:3(n-9), the fatty acid that uniquely characterizes EFA deficiency, were similar in both groups, however. Among diabetic EFA-deficient rats, the age at onset of diabetes was found to correlate inversely with the level of (n-6) fatty acids, the least depleted animals becoming diabetic earliest, whereas there was no correlation with levels of 20:3(n-9). Among animals repleted with linoleate beginning at 70 d, restoration of susceptibility to diabetes correlated with normalization of the level of arachidonate. In summary, EFA deprivation reduced the frequency of diabetes in both DP and RT6-depleted DR-BB rats. This protective effect was strongly associated with depletion of (n-6) fatty acids, particularly arachidonate, but not with accumulation of the abnormal 20:3(n-9). Conjecturally, arachidonate and/or a metabolite may play a key role in mediating inflammatory injury in this animal model of autoimmune diabetes.
必需脂肪酸(EFA)缺乏在几种自身免疫性疾病的动物模型中具有显著的保护作用。我们现在报告,EFA缺乏可预防BB大鼠患糖尿病,BB大鼠是人类胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的动物模型。在易患糖尿病(DP)的BB大鼠中,EFA缺乏大大降低了自发性糖尿病和胰岛炎(自身免疫性糖尿病的病理基础)的发生率。在抗糖尿病(DR)的BB大鼠中也观察到了这种缺乏状态的有益作用,这些大鼠在用抗体消除RT6 + T细胞后,否则会患上糖尿病。当在70日龄(在通常的易感期)给予EFA缺乏的DP - BB大鼠亚油酸膳食补充剂时,它们对自发性糖尿病的易感性得以恢复,但在120日龄(在糖尿病发病率高峰之后)开始补充时则没有恢复。EFA缺乏确实导致了生长迟缓,但热量限制的对照大鼠表明,缺乏状态的保护作用不是体重减轻的结果。为了研究EFA缺乏的生化变化与其在该系统中的生理效应之间的关系,我们比较了发生糖尿病和未发生糖尿病的EFA缺乏动物体内的脂肪酸变化。与糖尿病动物相比,非糖尿病动物的(n - 6)脂肪酸(即亚油酸和花生四烯酸)水平显著降低,而(n - 9)脂肪酸油酸水平升高。然而,两组中唯一表征EFA缺乏的脂肪酸20:3(n - 9)水平相似。在糖尿病EFA缺乏大鼠中,发现糖尿病发病年龄与(n - 6)脂肪酸水平呈负相关,(n - 6)脂肪酸消耗最少的动物最早患糖尿病,而与20:3(n - 9)水平无相关性。在70日龄开始补充亚油酸的动物中,对糖尿病易感性的恢复与花生四烯酸水平的正常化相关。总之,EFA缺乏降低了DP和RT6缺失的DR - BB大鼠的糖尿病发生率。这种保护作用与(n - 6)脂肪酸的消耗密切相关,尤其是花生四烯酸,但与异常的20:3(n - 9)的积累无关。据推测,花生四烯酸和/或一种代谢产物可能在这种自身免疫性糖尿病动物模型中介导炎症损伤方面起关键作用。