Suppr超能文献

全瓷冠与金属烤瓷冠的颜色匹配——一项分光光度研究。

Color matching of full ceramic versus metal-ceramic crowns - a spectrophotometric study.

作者信息

Greţa Delia Cristina, Gasparik Cristina, Colosi Horaţiu Alexandru, Dudea Diana

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Medical Education, Division of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Med Pharm Rep. 2020 Jan;93(1):89-96. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1330. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To verify the color match of metal-ceramic and full ceramic crowns, using instrumental methods.

METHODS

A number of 153 teeth (anterior and posterior teeth), in 62 patients, were restored with metal ceramic (MC, n=119), pressed-ceramic (PC, n=28), and zirconia-ceramic (ZC, n=6) full coverage crowns. The shade of a reference natural tooth was recorded instrumentally with a dental spectrophotometer (Vitaeasyshade Advance 4.0) in "single tooth measurement", which provided the base color in Vita Classic (VC) and Vita 3D Master shades (3D).For verifying the outcome of the restoration "verify restoration" mode was used, and ΔE values were recorded for both VC and 3D Master shade guides. Moreover, matching symbols were also recorded (***=good, **=fair, *=poor). Descriptive statistics was performed and data were analyzed (One-sample z-Test, α=0.05) for comparison with visual thresholds in dentistry (Perceptibility Threshold - PT=1.2 and Acceptability Threshold - AT=2.7).

RESULTS

The data did not follow a normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p<0.05). Recorded color difference was significantly higher than PT and AT, for all types of restorations, regardless of the coding system (p<0.05). For MC crowns in 2.52% (4.20% for 3D) of the cases the color difference was smaller than PT, in 19.32% (the same for 3D) of cases was between PT and AT, and in 78.15% (76.47% for 3D) of cases was higher than the AT. For PC crowns in 3.57% (0% for 3D) of the cases the color difference was smaller than PT, in 25% (32.14% for 3D) of cases was between PT and AT, and in 71.42% (67.85% for 3D) of cases was higher than the AT. In the case of ZC crowns none of the restorations had color difference smaller than PT, but in 16.66% of cases was between PT and AT, and in 83.33% of cases was higher than the AT, for both VC and 3D.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, a better color match was achieved in the case of pressed ceramic crowns, made of lithium disilicate. In most of the situations the color difference between the restoration and the reference tooth exceeded the perceptibility thresholds, but the matching was recorded as "fair" by the spectrophotometer.

摘要

背景与目的

采用仪器方法验证金属烤瓷冠和全瓷冠的颜色匹配度。

方法

对62例患者的153颗牙齿(前牙和后牙)进行修复,分别采用金属烤瓷(MC,n = 119)、压铸陶瓷(PC,n = 28)和氧化锆陶瓷(ZC,n = 6)全冠修复。使用牙科分光光度计(Vitaeasyshade Advance 4.0)以“单颗牙齿测量”方式通过仪器记录参考天然牙的色度,该方式可提供Vita Classic(VC)和Vita 3D Master色度(3D)中的基础颜色。为验证修复效果,采用“验证修复”模式,并记录VC和3D Master比色板的ΔE值。此外,还记录匹配符号(*** = 良好,** = 一般,* = 较差)。进行描述性统计并分析数据(单样本z检验,α = 0.05),以便与牙科视觉阈值(可察觉阈值 - PT = 1.2和可接受阈值 - AT = 2.7)进行比较。

结果

数据不服从正态分布(Kolmogorov - Smirnov检验,p < 0.05)。无论采用何种编码系统,所有类型修复体记录的颜色差异均显著高于PT和AT(p < 0.05)。对于MC冠,2.52%(3D为4.20%)的病例颜色差异小于PT,19.32%(3D相同)的病例颜色差异介于PT和AT之间,78.15%(3D为76.47%)的病例颜色差异高于AT。对于PC冠,3.57%(3D为0%)的病例颜色差异小于PT,25%(3D为32.14%)的病例颜色差异介于PT和AT之间,71.42%(3D为67.85%)的病例颜色差异高于AT。对于ZC冠,所有修复体的颜色差异均不小于PT,但16.66%的病例颜色差异介于PT和AT之间,83.33%的病例颜色差异高于AT,VC和3D均如此。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,由二硅酸锂制成的压铸陶瓷冠颜色匹配度更佳。在大多数情况下,修复体与参考牙齿之间的颜色差异超过了可察觉阈值,但分光光度计记录的匹配度为“一般”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cdd/7051824/c668a7cfe32f/cm-93-89f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验