Mpala Research Centre, P.O. Box 555, Nanyuki, 10400, Kenya.
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1026-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01942.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
Successful conservation of large terrestrial mammals (wildlife) on private lands requires that landowners be empowered to manage wildlife so that benefits outweigh the costs. Laikipia County, Kenya, is predominantly unfenced, and the land uses in the area allow wide-ranging wildlife to move freely between different management systems on private land. We used camera traps to sample large mammals associated with 4 different management systems (rhinoceros sanctuaries, no livestock; conservancies, intermediate stocking level; fenced ranches, high stocking level; and group ranches, high stocking level, no fencing, pastoralist clan ownership) to examine whether management and stocking levels affect wildlife. We deployed cameras at 522 locations across 8 properties from January 2008 through October 2010 and used the photographs taken during this period to estimate richness, occupancy, and relative abundance of species. Species richness was highest in conservancies and sanctuaries and lowest on fenced and group ranches. Occupancy estimates were, on average, 2 and 5 times higher in sanctuaries and conservancies as on fenced and group ranches, respectively. Nineteen species on fenced ranches and 25 species on group ranches were considered uncommon (occupancy < 0.1). The relative abundance of most species was highest or second highest in sanctuaries and conservancies. Lack of rights to manage and utilize wildlife and uncertain land tenure dampen many owners' incentives to tolerate wildlife. We suggest national conservation strategies consider landscape-level approaches to land-use planning that aim to increase conserved areas by providing landowners with incentives to tolerate wildlife. Possible incentives include improving access to ecotourism benefits, forging agreements to maintain wildlife habitat and corridors, resolving land-ownership conflicts, restoring degraded rangelands, expanding opportunities for grazing leases, and allowing direct benefits to landowners through wildlife harvesting. .
成功保护大型陆地哺乳动物(野生动物)需要赋予土地所有者管理野生动物的权力,以使收益大于成本。肯尼亚的莱基皮亚县主要是无围栏的,该地区的土地用途允许野生动物在私人土地上的不同管理系统之间自由移动。我们使用相机陷阱对与 4 种不同管理系统(犀牛保护区,无牲畜;保护区,中等放养水平;围场牧场,高放养水平;和集体牧场,高放养水平,无围栏,牧民部落所有)相关的大型哺乳动物进行了抽样调查,以研究管理和放养水平是否会影响野生动物。我们于 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 10 月在 8 个物业的 522 个地点部署了相机,并利用这段时间拍摄的照片来估计物种的丰富度、占有率和相对丰度。物种丰富度在保护区和保护区最高,在围场和集体牧场最低。保护区和保护区的平均占有率分别比围场和集体牧场高 2 倍和 5 倍。围场牧场有 19 种和集体牧场有 25 种被认为是不常见的(占有率<0.1)。大多数物种的相对丰度在保护区和保护区最高或第二高。缺乏管理和利用野生动物的权利以及土地保有权不确定,削弱了许多所有者容忍野生动物的积极性。我们建议国家保护策略考虑景观水平的土地利用规划方法,旨在通过为所有者提供容忍野生动物的激励措施来增加保护区。可能的激励措施包括改善生态旅游利益的获取、达成维持野生动物栖息地和走廊的协议、解决土地所有权冲突、恢复退化的牧场、扩大放牧租赁机会以及通过野生动物收获直接使土地所有者受益。