• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚干旱土地上的人畜混居土地利用:以 Lolldaiga 丘陵牧场为例。

Livestock-wildlife joint land use in dry lands of Kenya: a case study of the Lolldaiga Hills ranch.

机构信息

The Lolldaiga Institute, Nanyuki, Kenya.

出版信息

Anim Sci J. 2012 Jun;83(6):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00985.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00985.x
PMID:22694337
Abstract

This study aimed to examine livestock-wildlife interactions at the micro level and to quantify how resources are shared in joint land use by comparing the monitoring records collected on the Lolldaiga Hills ranch in Laikipia, Kenya from 1990s onwards. Livestock and wildlife distributions together with existing water points were geo-referenced; by air and road census total animal biomass densities were estimated. Through 38-h observation at a water point, livestock-wildlife interaction was recorded. During this period, water decline has been identified as an acute factor for farming and ranching. It was found that distributions of livestock and wildlife were related to water and pasture availability during the severe drought in 2009. Although there is seasonality in densities of both livestock and wildlife populations, results of air census indicated that the stable resident populations of wildlife have resided on the ranch. In this paper, we describe how livestock and wildlife interact at a water point and on pastures on the ranch in terms of biomass density. Such resources shared at different times need to be investigated further as a key factor to improve productivity of livestock-wildlife joint land use.

摘要

本研究旨在从微观层面研究牲畜-野生动物的相互作用,并通过比较肯尼亚莱基皮亚的洛利达加丘陵牧场从 20 世纪 90 年代以来收集的监测记录,来量化在联合土地利用中资源是如何共享的。牲畜和野生动物的分布情况以及现有的水源点都进行了地理参考定位;通过空中和道路普查,估计了动物生物量密度的总数。在一个水源点进行了 38 小时的观察,记录了牲畜-野生动物的相互作用。在此期间,已经确定水位下降是农业和牧场经营的一个严重问题。研究发现,在 2009 年严重干旱期间,牲畜和野生动物的分布与水和牧草的供应有关。尽管牲畜和野生动物的密度都存在季节性,但空气普查的结果表明,稳定的野生动物常驻种群一直生活在牧场上。在本文中,我们根据生物量密度描述了在牧场的一个水源点和牧场上牲畜和野生动物是如何相互作用的。需要进一步研究这些在不同时间共享的资源,因为这是提高牲畜-野生动物联合土地利用生产力的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Livestock-wildlife joint land use in dry lands of Kenya: a case study of the Lolldaiga Hills ranch.肯尼亚干旱土地上的人畜混居土地利用:以 Lolldaiga 丘陵牧场为例。
Anim Sci J. 2012 Jun;83(6):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00985.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
2
Effects of private-land use, livestock management, and human tolerance on diversity, distribution, and abundance of large african mammals.私人土地使用、牲畜管理和人类容忍度对大型非洲哺乳动物的多样性、分布和丰度的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1026-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01942.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
Spatial and temporal interactions between livestock and wildlife in South Central Spain assessed by camera traps.利用相机陷阱评估西班牙中南部家畜和野生动物的时空相互作用。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
4
Wildlife Population Dynamics in Human-Dominated Landscapes under Community-Based Conservation: The Example of Nakuru Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya.基于社区保护的人类主导景观中的野生动物种群动态:以肯尼亚纳库鲁野生动物保护区为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 19;12(1):e0169730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169730. eCollection 2017.
5
Review: Livestock production increasingly influences wildlife across the globe.综述:畜牧业生产日益影响全球范围内的野生动物。
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s372-s382. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001349. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Pathogen Exposure in Cattle at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface.家畜与野生动物交界处牛群中的病原体暴露情况。
Ecohealth. 2017 Sep;14(3):542-551. doi: 10.1007/s10393-017-1242-0. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Global perspectives on animal welfare: Africa.全球动物福利视角:非洲
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):579-87.
8
Long-term changes in northern large-herbivore communities reveal differential rewilding rates in space and time.长期以来,北方大型食草动物群落的变化揭示了空间和时间上不同的重新野生化速度。
PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0217166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217166. eCollection 2019.
9
The Zambian wildlife ranching industry: scale, associated benefits, and limitations affecting its development.赞比亚野生动物养殖产业:规模、相关效益及影响其发展的限制因素。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e81761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081761. eCollection 2013.
10
Pastoralism and wildlife: historical and current perspectives in the East African rangelands of Kenya and Tanzania.游牧业与野生动物:肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚东非牧场的历史与现状视角
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Nov;35(2):473-484. doi: 10.20506/rst.35.2.2536.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a unified generic framework to define and observe contacts between livestock and wildlife: a systematic review.迈向定义和观察家畜与野生动物接触的统一通用框架:一项系统综述。
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 26;8:e10221. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10221. eCollection 2020.