手术是否能改善食管鳞癌的预后?一项基于 1998 年至 2008 年监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处的数据的分析。

Does surgery improve outcomes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? An analysis using the surveillance epidemiology and end results registry from 1998 to 2008.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov;215(5):643-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.07.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined survival associated with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (SCC) to evaluate if treatment without surgery could be considered adequate.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry (SEER) registry with stage II-III SCC of the mid or distal esophagus from 1998-2008 were grouped by treatment with definitive radiation versus esophagectomy with or without radiation. Information on chemotherapy is not recorded in SEER. Tumor stage was defined as first clinical tumor stage in case of neo-adjuvant therapy and pathological report if no neo-adjuvant therapy was performed. Cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier approach and propensity-score adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of the 2,431 patients analyzed, there were 844 stage IIA (34.7%), 428 stage IIB (17.6%), 1,159 stage III (47.7%) patients. Most were treated with definitive radiation (n = 1,426, 58.7%). Of the 1,005 (41.3%) patients who underwent surgery, 369 (36.7%) had preoperative radiation, 160 (15.9%) had postoperative radiation, and 476 (47.4%) had no radiation. Five-year survival was 17.9% for all patients, and 22.1%, 18.5%, and 14.5% for stages IIA, IIB, and stage III, respectively. Compared to treatment that included surgery, definitive radiation alone predicted worse propensity-score adjusted survival for all patients (CSS Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.48, p < 0.001; OS HR 1.46, p < 0.001) and for stage IIA, IIB, and III patients individually (all p values ≤ 0.01). Compared to surgery alone, surgery with radiation predicted improved survival for stage III patients (CSS HR 0.62, p = 0.001, OS HR 0.62, p < 0.001) but not stage IIA or IIB (all p values > 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy is associated with improved survival for patients with locally advanced SCC and should be considered as an integral component of the treatment algorithm if feasible.

摘要

背景

我们研究了与局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(SCC)相关的生存情况,以评估不进行手术治疗是否足够。

研究设计

本研究纳入了 1998 年至 2008 年间在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处登记的中或下段食管 II-III 期 SCC 患者,根据根治性放疗与放化疗联合手术进行分组。SEER 未记录化疗信息。如果进行了新辅助治疗,则肿瘤分期为首次临床肿瘤分期;如果未进行新辅助治疗,则为病理报告分期。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和倾向评分调整的 Cox 比例风险模型分析癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)。

结果

在分析的 2431 名患者中,844 名患者为 IIA 期(34.7%),428 名患者为 IIB 期(17.6%),1159 名患者为 III 期(47.7%)。大多数患者接受了根治性放疗(n=1426,58.7%)。在 1005 名(41.3%)接受手术的患者中,369 名(36.7%)患者接受了术前放疗,160 名(15.9%)患者接受了术后放疗,476 名(47.4%)患者未接受放疗。所有患者的 5 年生存率为 17.9%,IIA、IIB 和 III 期患者的 5 年生存率分别为 22.1%、18.5%和 14.5%。与包含手术的治疗相比,单纯根治性放疗对所有患者(CSS 风险比 [HR] 1.48,p<0.001;OS HR 1.46,p<0.001)和 IIA、IIB 和 III 期患者的预后调整生存均较差(所有 p 值均≤0.01)。与单纯手术相比,手术联合放疗可改善 III 期患者的生存(CSS HR 0.62,p=0.001,OS HR 0.62,p<0.001),但对 IIA 期或 IIB 期患者无影响(所有 p 值均>0.18)。

结论

对于局部晚期 SCC 患者,手术切除与生存改善相关,如果可行,应将其作为治疗方案的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索