Suppr超能文献

慢性静脉溃疡:浅表轴性静脉和穿支静脉反流的微创治疗可加速愈合并减少复发。

Chronic venous ulcer: minimally invasive treatment of superficial axial and perforator vein reflux speeds healing and reduces recurrence.

作者信息

Alden Peter B, Lips Erin M, Zimmerman Kate P, Garberich Ross F, Rizvi Adnan Z, Tretinyak Alexander S, Alexander Jason Q, Dorr Kathryn M, Hutchinson Mark, Isakson Sarah L

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;27(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic venous ulcer (CVU) is common and is responsible for significant health care expenditures worldwide. Compression is the mainstay of treatment, but long-term compliance with this therapy is often inconsistent, particularly in the elderly and infirm. Surgical ablation of axial and perforator reflux has been used as an adjunct to compression to reduce recurrence rates and assist healing. These surgical techniques are being replaced by minimally invasive procedures, such as thermal ablation and foam sclerotherapy, in the treatment of uncomplicated venous disease. The role for these techniques in the treatment of CVU is just beginning to be defined.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with CVU with 95 active ulcers (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, Physiology-CEAP clinical class 6) presenting to a multispecialty wound clinic were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed by leg. All patients underwent duplex scanning for venous insufficiency. Ulcer dimensions at each visit were recorded and used to calculate healing rates. Presence or absence of ulcer recurrence at 1-year follow-up was recorded. Ulcers treated with compression alone ("compression group") were compared with those treated with compression and minimally invasive interventions, such as thermal ablation of superficial axial reflux and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) of incompetent perforating veins and varicosities ("intervention group").

RESULTS

The average age in the intervention and compression groups was 67 and 71 years, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). Body mass index was 32.4 ± 9.5 and 33.6 ± 11.8 kg/m(2), in the compression and intervention groups, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). Ulcers were recurrent in 42% of the intervention group and 26% of the compression group (P = NS). In the intervention group, 33% had radiofrequency ablation of axial reflux, 31% had UGFS of perforators, and 29% had both treatments. The only complication of intervention was a single case of cellulitis requiring hospitalization. Compared with the compression group, the ulcers in the intervention group healed faster (9.7% vs. 4.2% per week; P = 0.001) and showed fewer recurrences at 1-year follow-up (27.1% vs. 48.9 %; P < 0.015). Multivariate analysis showed use of intervention was the strongest determinant of healing with a coefficient of variation of 7.432, SE 2.406, P = 0.003. Analysis of just the intervention group before and after intervention using matched pairs showed acceleration of healing after intervention from ranging from a median of 1.2% (interquartile range [IQR], 14.3) to 9.7% (IQR, 11.3) per week (P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive ablation of superficial axial and perforator vein reflux in patients with active CVU is safe and leads to faster healing and decreased ulcer recurrence when combined with compression alone in the treatment of CVU.

摘要

背景

慢性静脉溃疡(CVU)很常见,在全球范围内造成了巨大的医疗保健支出。加压治疗是主要的治疗方法,但长期坚持这种治疗往往不一致,尤其是在老年人和体弱者中。轴向和穿通支反流的手术消融已被用作加压治疗的辅助手段,以降低复发率并促进愈合。在治疗单纯性静脉疾病时,这些手术技术正被诸如热消融和泡沫硬化疗法等微创手术所取代。这些技术在CVU治疗中的作用刚刚开始被明确。

方法

对86例患有CVU且有95处活动性溃疡(临床、病因、解剖、生理-CEAP临床分级6级)的患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者就诊于一家多专科伤口诊所,并按腿部进行分析。所有患者均接受了静脉功能不全的双功扫描。每次就诊时记录溃疡尺寸,并用于计算愈合率。记录1年随访时溃疡是否复发。将单纯接受加压治疗的溃疡(“加压组”)与接受加压治疗并结合微创手术(如浅表轴向反流的热消融以及对功能不全的穿通静脉和静脉曲张进行超声引导下泡沫硬化疗法(UGFS))的溃疡(“干预组”)进行比较。

结果

干预组和加压组的平均年龄分别为67岁和71岁(P =无显著差异[NS])。加压组和干预组的体重指数分别为32.4±9.5和33.6±11.8 kg/m²(P =无显著差异[NS])。干预组42%的溃疡复发,加压组为26%(P =无显著差异[NS])。在干预组中,33%进行了轴向反流的射频消融,31%进行了穿通支的UGFS,29%同时接受了这两种治疗。干预的唯一并发症是1例蜂窝织炎需要住院治疗。与加压组相比,干预组的溃疡愈合更快(每周9.7%对4.2%;P = 0.001),且在1年随访时复发较少(27.1%对48.9%;P < 0.015)。多变量分析显示,使用干预是愈合的最强决定因素,变异系数为7.432,标准误为2.406,P = 0.003。对干预组干预前后进行配对分析显示,干预后愈合加速,从每周中位数1.2%(四分位间距[IQR],14.3)提高到9.7%(IQR,11.3)(P≤0.001)。

结论

对活动性CVU患者进行浅表轴向和穿通静脉反流的微创消融是安全的,与单纯加压治疗联合用于CVU治疗时,可加快愈合并减少溃疡复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验