• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输卵管疾病女性中衣原体抗体的患病率:沙眼衣原体对体外受精需求的影响

Prevalence of chlamydial antibodies in women with tubal disease: impact of Chlamydia trachomatis on the demand for in vitro fertilisation.

作者信息

Peek J C, Graham F M, Hookham A

机构信息

National Women's Hospital, Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1990 Feb 28;103(884):63-5.

PMID:2308725
Abstract

Serum IgG and IgA antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis were measured in 102 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) patients with tubal disease and in 102 infertility patients without tubal disease to assess the impact of chlamydial infection on the demand for IVF treatment in New Zealand. Sixty-five percent of the IVF patients had IgG titres greater than or equal to 1:64, compared to 24% of the controls; 29% of the IVF patients had IgA titres greater than or equal to 1:32 compared to 0% of the controls. The proportion of IVF patients with IgG antibodies increased from 39% for those from socioeconomic group 1 to 79% of those from groups 4 to 6. The difference in prevalence of IgG antibodies between the tubal and nontubal patients suggests that about 40% of the tubal infertility currently being treated by IVF has chlamydia as a causal agent. The presence of IgG or IgA antibodies did not seem to affect the chance of pregnancy in the IVF programme, nor the chance of subsequent miscarriage.

摘要

对102名患有输卵管疾病的体外受精(IVF)患者和102名无输卵管疾病的不孕症患者检测了沙眼衣原体的血清IgG和IgA抗体,以评估衣原体感染对新西兰IVF治疗需求的影响。65%的IVF患者IgG滴度大于或等于1:64,而对照组为24%;29%的IVF患者IgA滴度大于或等于1:32,而对照组为0%。IVF患者中具有IgG抗体的比例从社会经济第1组的39%增至第4至6组的79%。输卵管疾病患者和非输卵管疾病患者之间IgG抗体患病率的差异表明,目前通过IVF治疗的输卵管性不孕症中约40%由衣原体作为病因。IgG或IgA抗体的存在似乎不影响IVF程序中的妊娠几率,也不影响随后流产的几率。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of chlamydial antibodies in women with tubal disease: impact of Chlamydia trachomatis on the demand for in vitro fertilisation.输卵管疾病女性中衣原体抗体的患病率:沙眼衣原体对体外受精需求的影响
N Z Med J. 1990 Feb 28;103(884):63-5.
2
[Correlation of positivity for serum anti-chlamydia antibodies and tubal damage as a cause of infertility. Preliminary study].
Minerva Ginecol. 1989 May;41(5):215-8.
3
[The role of Chlamydia trachomatis in tubal sterility].沙眼衣原体在输卵管性不孕中的作用
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1993;32(1):21-2.
4
Success rates in in vitro fertilization treatment and its correlation with high titer antibodies for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Isr J Med Sci. 1991 Oct;27(10):546-9.
5
Elevated serum Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies. What do they mean for IVF pregnancy rates and loss?血清沙眼衣原体IgG抗体升高。它们对体外受精妊娠率和流产意味着什么?
J Reprod Med. 1997 May;42(5):281-6.
6
[Chlamydia trachomatis and infertility in women].[沙眼衣原体与女性不孕症]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Aug 30;109(24):2427-9.
7
[Cultural and serologic Chlamydia detection in diagnosis of sterility and increased risk of infection].[衣原体感染导致不育及感染风险增加的文化与血清学检测诊断]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1990 May;50(5):371-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026264.
8
Tubal infertility: serologic relationship to past chlamydial and gonococcal infection. World Health Organization Task Force on the Prevention and Management of Infertility.输卵管性不孕:与既往衣原体和淋球菌感染的血清学关系。世界卫生组织不孕症预防和管理特别工作组。
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Mar-Apr;22(2):71-7.
9
Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein 60 (cHSP60) and Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) in women with different tubal status.不同输卵管状态女性体内沙眼衣原体热休克蛋白60(cHSP60)和沙眼衣原体主要外膜蛋白(MOMP)的抗体
Clin Lab. 2003;49(5-6):269-71.
10
Tubal factor pathology caused by Chlamydia trachomatis: the role of serology.沙眼衣原体引起的输卵管因素病理:血清学的作用。
Int J STD AIDS. 2002 Dec;13 Suppl 2:26-9. doi: 10.1258/095646202762226128.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune consequences of Chlamydia infections in pregnancy and in vitro fertilization outcome.衣原体感染对妊娠及体外受精结局的免疫影响。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(3):143-8. doi: 10.1155/S1064744996000312.