• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层医学与报销问题。

Stratified medicine and reimbursement issues.

机构信息

University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2012 Oct 15;3:181. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00181. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2012.00181
PMID:23087645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3471319/
Abstract

Stratified Medicine (SM) has the potential to target patient populations who will most benefit from a therapy while reducing unnecessary health interventions associated with side effects. The link between clinical biomarkers/diagnostics and therapies provides new opportunities for value creation to strengthen the value proposition to pricing and reimbursement (P&R) authorities. However, the introduction of SM challenges current reimbursement schemes in many EU countries and the US as different P&R policies have been adopted for drugs and diagnostics. Also, there is a lack of a consistent process for value assessment of more complex diagnostics in these markets. New, innovative approaches and more flexible P&R systems are needed to reflect the added value of diagnostic tests and to stimulate investments in new technologies. Yet, the framework for access of diagnostic-based therapies still requires further development while setting the right incentives and appropriate align stakeholders interests when realizing long-term patient benefits. This article addresses the reimbursement challenges of SM approaches in several EU countries and the US outlining some options to overcome existing reimbursement barriers for stratified medicine.

摘要

分层医学(SM)有可能针对最能从治疗中获益的患者群体,同时减少与副作用相关的不必要的健康干预。临床生物标志物/诊断与治疗之间的联系为价值创造提供了新的机会,以加强对定价和报销(P&R)机构的价值主张。然而,SM 的引入对许多欧盟国家和美国的现行报销方案提出了挑战,因为不同的 P&R 政策已分别针对药物和诊断采用。此外,这些市场缺乏对更复杂诊断进行价值评估的一致流程。需要新的、创新的方法和更灵活的 P&R 系统来反映诊断测试的附加值,并刺激对新技术的投资。然而,基于诊断的治疗方法的准入框架仍需要进一步发展,同时在实现长期患者利益时设定正确的激励措施并适当调整利益相关者的利益。本文探讨了欧盟几个国家和美国在 SM 方法方面的报销挑战,概述了克服分层医学现有报销障碍的一些选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d93/3471319/b1aa6ffa64f4/fphar-03-00181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d93/3471319/b1aa6ffa64f4/fphar-03-00181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d93/3471319/b1aa6ffa64f4/fphar-03-00181-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stratified medicine and reimbursement issues.分层医学与报销问题。
Front Pharmacol. 2012 Oct 15;3:181. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00181. eCollection 2012.
2
The application of economics concepts to stratified medicine--use of health economics data to support market access for stratified medicine interventions.经济学概念在分层医学中的应用——利用卫生经济学数据支持分层医学干预措施的市场准入。
J Med Econ. 2014 May;17(5):305-11. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.902842. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Economic Evaluation in Stratified Medicine: Methodological Issues and Challenges.分层医学中的经济评估:方法学问题与挑战
Front Pharmacol. 2016 May 9;7:113. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00113. eCollection 2016.
5
Economic viability of Stratified Medicine concepts: An investor perspective on drivers and conditions that favour using Stratified Medicine approaches in a cost-contained healthcare environment.分层医学概念的经济可行性:投资者对在成本可控的医疗环境中采用分层医学方法的驱动因素和条件的看法。
N Biotechnol. 2016 Dec 25;33(6):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
The Value of Companion Diagnostics: Overcoming Access Barriers to Transform Personalised Health Care into an Affordable Reality in Europe.伴随诊断的价值:克服准入障碍,将个性化医疗转变为欧洲可负担得起的现实。
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(3):137-43. doi: 10.1159/000446531. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.定价与报销政策如何提高药品的可及性?从欧洲国家汲取的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z.
8
REIMBURSEMENT OF CELL-BASED REGENERATIVE THERAPY IN THE UK AND FRANCE.英国和法国基于细胞的再生疗法的报销情况。
Med Law Rev. 2016 Spring;24(2):234-58. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww009. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Tuberculosis结核病
10
Multi-indication and Combination Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals: Opportunities for Improved Health Care through Faster Uptake of New Innovations.药品多适应症和联合用药定价与报销:通过加快采用新创新来改善医疗保健的机会。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Apr;16(2):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0377-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.个性化医学的融资和报销模式:系统评价以确定当前模式和未来选择。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):501-524. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work.生物标志物分析对西妥昔单抗联合 FOLFIRI 作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的成本效益的影响:个体化医学的实践。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0395-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Market access challenges in the EU for high medical value diagnostic tests.欧盟高医疗价值诊断检测的市场准入挑战。
Per Med. 2011 Mar;8(2):137-148. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.2.
2
Molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine: value-assessed opportunities for multiple stakeholders.分子诊断与个性化医疗:多利益相关者的价值评估机遇
Per Med. 2010 Mar;7(2):143-161. doi: 10.2217/pme.10.1.
3
Health technology assessments in personalized medicine: illustrations for cost-effectiveness analysis.个性化医疗中的卫生技术评估:成本效益分析实例
The Clinical and Health Economic Value of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics.
临床实验室诊断的临床及卫生经济价值
EJIFCC. 2015 Jan 27;26(1):47-62. eCollection 2015 Jan.
4
Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments.个性化医疗的经济学评估:现存挑战与当前进展
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2015 Jun 24;8:115-26. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S35063. eCollection 2015.
5
Therapeutic target database update 2014: a resource for targeted therapeutics.治疗靶点数据库更新 2014:靶向治疗的资源。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1118-23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1129. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
6
Personalizing health care: feasibility and future implications.个性化医疗保健:可行性及未来影响。
BMC Med. 2013 Aug 13;11:179. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-179.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Aug;11(4):367-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.50.
4
Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review.药物基因组学的成本效益:批判性和系统性综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(11):1001-13. doi: 10.2165/11537410-000000000-00000.
5
When do new biomarkers make economic sense?新型生物标志物何时具有经济意义?
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2010;242:90-5. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2010.493411.
6
Economic opportunities and challenges for pharmacogenomics.药物基因组学的经济机遇与挑战。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:423-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105805.
7
Personalized medicine: factors influencing reimbursement.个性化医学:影响报销的因素。
Health Policy. 2010 Feb;94(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
8
The microeconomics of personalized medicine: today's challenge and tomorrow's promise.个性化医疗的微观经济学:当今的挑战与明日的前景。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Apr;8(4):279-86. doi: 10.1038/nrd2825. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
9
Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective.欧洲新肿瘤产品的市场与患者可及性:当前的多学科视角
Ann Oncol. 2009 Mar;20(3):403-12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn603. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of pharmacogenetic and genomic screening programmes: a systematic review on content and adherence to guidelines.药物遗传学和基因组筛查项目的药物经济学评估:关于内容及对指南遵循情况的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(7):569-87. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826070-00005.