Miller Iain, Ashton-Chess Joanna, Spolders Herman, Fert Vincent, Ferrara Joseph, Kroll Werner, Askaa Jon, Larcier Patrick, Terry Patrick F, Bruinvels Anne, Huriez Alain
BioMerieux, Cambridge, MA, USA.
European Personalised Medicine Association, 44200 Nantes, France.
Per Med. 2011 Mar;8(2):137-148. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.2.
The clinical utility and medico-economic value of several personalized diagnostic tests has been well described in the literature. Development of such tests, including generation of the necessary supportive clinical validation data, is a complex and expensive endeavor. In general, sponsors of such tests lack sufficient clarity on appropriate reimbursement and regulatory pathways to provide the clear development framework necessary to incentivize the required level of investment. In the USA, an imperfect reimbursement paradigm has evolved to accommodate a small number of 'value-priced' laboratory-developed tests, although major structural barriers remain to broader implementation. In Europe, by contrast, there is virtually no precedent for value-based public sector pricing, and even such procedurally based pricing as currently exists is administered by a complex network of largely decentralized bodies. As a consequence, patient access is limited and health-economic savings are not realized. This article explores some of the European market entry barriers, with a focus on reimbursement challenges, and highlights some collaborative proposals to address such.
几种个性化诊断测试的临床效用和医学经济价值在文献中已有充分描述。开发此类测试,包括生成必要的支持性临床验证数据,是一项复杂且昂贵的工作。一般而言,此类测试的赞助商在适当的报销和监管途径方面缺乏足够的清晰度,无法提供激励所需投资水平所需的明确开发框架。在美国,尽管仍存在重大结构性障碍阻碍更广泛的实施,但已形成了一种不完善的报销模式,以适应少数“价值定价”的实验室开发测试。相比之下,在欧洲,基于价值的公共部门定价几乎没有先例,即使是目前存在的基于程序的定价也是由一个主要分散的机构组成的复杂网络进行管理。因此,患者获得此类测试的机会有限,且未实现卫生经济节约。本文探讨了一些欧洲市场进入壁垒,重点是报销挑战,并强调了一些应对此类挑战的合作建议。