• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽量减少医学上不必要的计算机断层扫描。

Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans.

作者信息

Brenner D J

机构信息

Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Ann ICRP. 2012 Oct-Dec;41(3-4):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.004
PMID:23089015
Abstract

As computed tomography (CT) is such a superb diagnostic tool and individual CT risks are small, whenever a CT scan is clinically warranted, the CT benefit/risk balance is by far in the patient's favour. However, if a CT scan is not clinically warranted, this balance shifts dramatically. It is likely that at least 25% of CT scans fall into this latter category, in that they could either be replaced with alternative imaging modalities or could be avoided entirely. Use of clinical decision rules for CT usage represents a powerful approach for slowing down the increase in CT usage, because they have the potential to overcome some of the major factors that result in some CT scans being undertaken when they may not be clinically helpful.

摘要

由于计算机断层扫描(CT)是一种如此出色的诊断工具,而且单次CT检查的风险很小,所以只要临床上有必要进行CT扫描,其益处/风险平衡显然对患者有利。然而,如果CT扫描在临床上没有必要,这种平衡就会发生巨大变化。很可能至少25%的CT扫描属于后一种情况,也就是说它们要么可以被其他成像方式取代,要么可以完全避免。使用CT检查的临床决策规则是减缓CT检查使用量增加的一种有效方法,因为它们有可能克服一些导致在临床上可能没有帮助时仍进行某些CT扫描的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Minimising medically unwarranted computed tomography scans.尽量减少医学上不必要的计算机断层扫描。
Ann ICRP. 2012 Oct-Dec;41(3-4):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
2
Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans.降低 CT 扫描所致人群剂量的增长速度。
Radiat Res. 2010 Dec;174(6):809-15. doi: 10.1667/RR1859.1. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
3
The increasing use of CT and its risks.CT使用的增加及其风险。
Radiol Technol. 2007 Nov-Dec;79(2):186-90.
4
Radiation exposure and the justification of computed tomography scanning in an Australian hospital emergency department.澳大利亚医院急诊部门的辐射暴露与计算机断层扫描的正当性。
Intern Med J. 2009 Nov;39(11):713-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01956.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
5
PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.儿童PET/CT和SPECT/CT剂量测定:儿科影像医师面临的挑战
Semin Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;37(5):391-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.05.002.
6
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.诊断性放射学带来的癌症风险。
Br J Radiol. 2008 May;81(965):362-78. doi: 10.1259/bjr/01948454.
7
Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.计算机断层扫描与辐射:了解相关问题。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.012.
8
Perspective on radiation risk in CT imaging.CT成像中的辐射风险透视
Abdom Imaging. 2013 Feb;38(1):22-31. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9933-z.
9
Will CT ordering practices change if we educate residents about the potential effects of radiation exposure? Experience at a large academic medical center.如果我们向住院医师普及辐射暴露的潜在影响,他们的 CT 检查申请行为会发生改变吗?来自一家大型学术医学中心的经验。
Acad Radiol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1447-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
10
Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT.临床患者人群行心脏 CT 检查的辐射相关癌症风险。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W159-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4981.

引用本文的文献

1
Shortage of iodinated contrast media: Status and possible chances - A systematic review.碘对比剂短缺:现状与可能的机会——系统评价。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Jul;164:110853. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110853. Epub 2023 May 3.
2
The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.计算机断层扫描相关风险:对可用于患者信息与指导的在线文本的可读性和可靠性评估
Cureus. 2022 Oct 27;14(10):e30758. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30758. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Analysis of the appropriateness of orthopaedic computed tomography scans as exemplified by lower extremity bones and joints.
以下肢骨骼和关节为例分析骨科计算机断层扫描的适宜性。
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Feb 7;87:e69-e78. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.113330. eCollection 2022.
4
Randomized control trial comparing an Alvarado Score-based management algorithm and current best practice in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis.比较基于 Alvarado 评分的管理算法与当前疑似阑尾炎评估最佳实践的随机对照试验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 May 1;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00309-0.
5
Effects of chronic low-dose radiation on cataract prevalence and characterization in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Fukushima, Japan.日本福岛野生猪白内障患病率及特征受慢性低剂量辐射的影响
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 4;10(1):4055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59734-5.
6
The IMPACT Study - Single Inhaler Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) Versus FF/VI And UMEC/VI In Patients With COPD: Efficacy And Safety In A Japanese Population.IMPACT研究——慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用单吸入器三联疗法(FF/UMEC/VI)与FF/VI及UMEC/VI的对比:日本人群中的疗效与安全性
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Dec 6;14:2849-2861. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S226601. eCollection 2019.
7
Evaluation of Ameliorative Potential of Vitamins E and C on DNA Double Strand Break (DSB) in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography (CT): A Clinical Study.维生素E和维生素C对接受计算机断层扫描(CT)患者DNA双链断裂(DSB)的改善潜力评估:一项临床研究
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2018 Fall;7(4):226-233. doi: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.7.4.226. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
A comparative study of radiation doses between phantom and patients via CT angiography of the intra-/extra-cranial, pulmonary, and abdominal/pelvic arteries.通过颅内/颅外、肺部以及腹部/盆腔动脉的CT血管造影术对模体与患者之间的辐射剂量进行的对比研究。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2019 Dec;12(4):374-381. doi: 10.1007/s12194-019-00532-8. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
High-pitch CT, decreasing need for sedation and its potential side effects: some practical considerations and future directions.高分辨率CT、镇静需求的降低及其潜在副作用:一些实际考量与未来方向
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Mar;49(3):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4314-6. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
Clinically Unjustified Diagnostic Imaging - a Worrisome Tendency in Today's Medical Practice.临床不合理的诊断性影像学检查——当今医疗实践中令人担忧的趋势。
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Jul 13;81:325-30. doi: 10.12659/PJR.896847. eCollection 2016.