Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10;30(35):4302-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.5297. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
Brachytherapy has disseminated into clinical practice as an alternative to whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for early-stage breast cancer; however, current national treatment patterns and associated complications remain unknown.
We constructed a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 66 to 94 years who underwent breast-conserving surgery from 2008 to 2009 and were treated with brachytherapy or WBI. We used hospital referral regions (HRRs) to assess national treatment variation and an instrumental variable analysis to compare complication rates between treatment groups, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. We compared overall, wound and skin, and deep-tissue and bone complications between brachytherapy and WBI at 1 year of follow-up.
Of 29,648 women in our sample, 4,671 (15.8%) received brachytherapy. The percent of patients receiving brachytherapy varied substantially across HRRs, ranging from 0% to over 70% (interquartile range, 7.5% to 23.3%). Of women treated with brachytherapy, 34.3% had a complication compared with 27.3% of women undergoing WBI (P < .001). After adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics, 35.2% of women treated with brachytherapy (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.9) had a complication compared with 18.4% treated with WBI (95% CI, 15.5 to 21.3; P value for difference, <.001). Brachytherapy was associated with a 16.9% higher rate of wound and skin complications compared with WBI (95% CI, 10.0 to 23.9; P < .001), but there was no difference in deep-tissue and bone complications.
Brachytherapy is commonly used among Medicare beneficiaries and varies substantially across regions. After 1 year, wound and skin complications were significantly higher among women receiving brachytherapy compared with those receiving WBI.
近距离放射疗法已广泛应用于临床实践,作为早期乳腺癌全乳照射(WBI)的替代疗法;然而,目前尚不清楚全国的治疗模式和相关并发症。
我们构建了一个由年龄在 66 岁至 94 岁之间、2008 年至 2009 年期间接受保乳手术并接受近距离放射疗法或 WBI 治疗的 Medicare 受益人的全国性样本。我们使用医院转诊区(HRR)来评估全国治疗的差异,并使用工具变量分析来比较治疗组之间的并发症发生率,同时调整患者和临床特征。我们比较了在 1 年随访时近距离放射疗法和 WBI 之间的总体、伤口和皮肤以及深部组织和骨骼并发症。
在我们的样本中,29648 名女性中有 4671 名(15.8%)接受了近距离放射疗法。接受近距离放射疗法的患者比例在 HRR 之间差异很大,从 0%到超过 70%(四分位间距,7.5%至 23.3%)。在接受近距离放射疗法的女性中,有 34.3%的人发生了并发症,而接受 WBI 的女性中这一比例为 27.3%(P<0.001)。在调整了患者和临床特征后,接受近距离放射疗法的女性中有 35.2%(95%CI,28.6 至 41.9)发生了并发症,而接受 WBI 的女性中这一比例为 18.4%(95%CI,15.5 至 21.3;差异的 P 值<0.001)。与 WBI 相比,近距离放射疗法导致伤口和皮肤并发症的发生率高 16.9%(95%CI,10.0 至 23.9;P<0.001),但深部组织和骨骼并发症没有差异。
近距离放射疗法在 Medicare 受益人中被广泛使用,并且在各地区之间存在很大差异。1 年后,接受近距离放射疗法的女性与接受 WBI 的女性相比,伤口和皮肤并发症的发生率显著更高。