Operative Dentistry Division, Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):316-23. doi: 10.2341/12-224-L. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of a 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent on the microhardness of four types of direct resin-based restorative materials.
Thirty disk-shaped specimens (10.0 mm diameter × 2.0 mm depth) of each material, including a microhybrid resin composite (Z250), a nanofilled resin composite (Z350), a silorane-based low-shrink resin composite (P90), and a hybrid resin composite (Valux Plus), were fabricated and then polished with medium, fine, and superfine polishing discs. After being polished, specimens were cleaned with distilled water for 2 min in an ultrasonic bath to remove any surface debris and then stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. Specimens from each material were divided into three groups (n=10). One group was selected as a control group (nontreated with bleaching agent). The other two groups were treated with bleaching agent for 14 days (group A) and for 14 days followed by immersion in artificial saliva for 14 days (group B). The top surfaces of the specimens in the different groups were also subjected to the Vickers hardness test with a load of 300 g and 15-second dwell time. Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).
There was a general reduction of Vickers hardness numbers (VHN) values of treated groups compared with the control group for each material used, but this reduction was minimal, with no significant difference between groups in Z250, whereas the other three materials (Z350, P90, and Valux Plus) showed a significant reduction of VHN of treated groups compared with the control group. Conversely, the findings showed no significant difference between treated groups A and B in all materials used except P90.
A 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent had an adverse effect on the microhardness of nanofilled, silorane-based low-shrink, and hybrid types of resin-based composite materials compared with the microhybrid type.
本体外研究旨在评估 10%过氧化脲漂白剂对 4 种直接树脂基修复材料的显微硬度的影响。
制备 30 个各材料(直径 10.0mm×深度 2.0mm)的圆盘状试件,包括微混合树脂复合材料(Z250)、纳米复合树脂复合材料(Z350)、硅烷树脂基低收缩树脂复合材料(P90)和混合树脂复合材料(Valux Plus),然后用中、细和超细抛光片进行抛光。抛光后,将试件用蒸馏水在超声浴中清洗 2 分钟以去除任何表面碎屑,然后在 37°C 的蒸馏水中储存 24 小时。从每种材料中选择 30 个试件(n=10),分为 3 组(n=10)。一组为对照组(未用漂白剂处理)。另外两组用漂白剂处理 14 天(A 组),然后在人工唾液中浸泡 14 天(B 组)。用 300g 负载和 15 秒停留时间对不同组的试件的顶表面进行维氏硬度测试。用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 的 HSD 检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。
与对照组相比,各材料处理组的维氏硬度值(VHN)普遍降低,但降低幅度较小,Z250 组之间无显著差异,而其他三种材料(Z350、P90 和 Valux Plus)的处理组 VHN 与对照组相比显著降低。相反,除 P90 外,在所有使用的材料中,处理组 A 和 B 之间的发现没有显著差异。
与微混合类型相比,10%过氧化脲漂白剂对纳米复合、硅烷树脂基低收缩和混合类型的树脂基复合材料的显微硬度有不利影响。