Yu Hao, Li Qing, Wang Yi-Ning, Cheng Hui
Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, China.
J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
To investigate the effects of in-office bleaching agents on surface and subsurface properties of dental materials at different environmental temperatures.
Four composite resins, a compomer, a conventional glass-ionomer cement (CGIC), and an industrially sintered ceramic material were evaluated in the present study. Four groups of each material (n=10) were treated: bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide at 25°C and 37°C, stored in artificial saliva at 25°C and 37°C. The specimens from bleaching groups were bleached for two sessions, each of two 20 min application, at respective temperatures. After bleaching, the surface and subsurface (0.1-0.5mm) microhardness were evaluated using a Vickers microhardness tester. The substance loss was determined by surface profilometry. The data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and the Tukey's post hoc test.
All materials were found to have surface softening after bleaching, and bleaching effects on surface micorhardness increased at 37°C compared with 25°C, except for the ceramic. After being bleached at 37°C, the microhardness values of flowable composite resin significantly reduced at a depth of 0.1mm compared with control specimen stored at 37°C. No significant difference was found between the control and bleached specimens with respect to substance loss for any of the materials.
The influence of environmental temperature on the in-office bleaching effects on surface and subsurface microhardness of dental materials was material-dependent. However, no substance loss was detected due to the tested bleaching regimen.
Environmental temperature should be considered when evaluating the possible bleaching effects on restorative materials. Moreover, dentists should be aware that there might be a need for polishing of restorative materials in clinical situations in which restorations are accidentally exposed to bleaching gels.
研究诊室漂白剂在不同环境温度下对牙科材料表面及次表面性能的影响。
本研究评估了四种复合树脂、一种聚酸改性复合树脂、一种传统玻璃离子水门汀(CGIC)和一种工业烧结陶瓷材料。每种材料分为四组(n = 10)进行处理:分别在25°C和37°C下用40%过氧化氢漂白,然后在25°C和37°C的人工唾液中储存。漂白组的标本在各自温度下进行两个疗程的漂白,每个疗程两次,每次20分钟。漂白后,使用维氏显微硬度计评估表面和次表面(0.1 - 0.5mm)的显微硬度。通过表面轮廓仪测定物质损失。数据采用方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行统计学分析。
所有材料在漂白后均出现表面软化,除陶瓷外,与25°C相比,37°C时漂白对表面显微硬度的影响更大。在37°C漂白后,与在37°C储存的对照标本相比,可流动复合树脂在0.1mm深度处的显微硬度值显著降低。对于任何材料,对照标本和漂白标本在物质损失方面均未发现显著差异。
环境温度对诊室漂白对牙科材料表面及次表面显微硬度的影响因材料而异。然而,在所测试的漂白方案下未检测到物质损失。
在评估对修复材料可能的漂白效果时应考虑环境温度。此外,牙医应意识到,在修复体意外接触漂白凝胶的临床情况下,可能需要对修复材料进行抛光。