Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Prosthodontics, Tokyo, Japan.
Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):309-15. doi: 10.2341/12-233-L. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
The dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in the CEREC system was compared to that of the conventional physical method in vitro using a bite registration material. Maxillary and mandibular full-arch dentate epoxy models mounted on an articulator were used to measure the interarch distance and the angles created by the occlusal planes. The preparations for a single restoration on the maxillary first molar or for multiple restorations on the maxillary posterior quadrant were made on the model. Optical impression and bite registration data were collected to construct virtual models using computer-aided design software. A silicone material was used for the physical method, and the dimensional accuracy was measured by means of the coordinate measuring machine. The discrepancy relative to the baseline before preparation was analyzed in each registration record. For the single restoration, the optical method created a mean discrepancy of 243.2 μm relative to baseline at the prepared tooth, which was insignificantly but slightly lower than the mean discrepancy of 311.1 μm obtained with the physical method. The mean rotational deviation in the horizontal plane was significantly lower for the optical method. For the multiple preparations, the optical method showed significantly larger discrepancy on the right molar and on the left premolar and molar sites. In the frontal view, the optical method created significantly larger rotational deviation than the physical method. The result indicates that the optical bite registration was effective in terms of dimensional accuracy for single posterior restorations.
采用咬合记录材料,体外比较 Cerec 系统光学咬合记录的尺寸精度与传统物理方法。将上颌和下颌全牙列齿科模型安装在牙合架上,用于测量牙弓间的距离以及由咬合平面形成的角度。在上颌第一磨牙或上颌后牙区的多个部位制作单个修复体的预备。使用计算机辅助设计软件收集光学印模和咬合记录数据来构建虚拟模型。采用硅橡胶材料进行物理方法,通过坐标测量机测量尺寸精度。分析每个记录中的制备前基线的差异。对于单个修复体,光学方法在预备牙处相对于基线产生的平均差异为 243.2μm,与物理方法获得的 311.1μm 平均差异相比,虽然略有降低,但无统计学意义。光学方法在水平平面上的旋转偏差明显较低。对于多个预备,光学方法在右侧磨牙以及左侧前磨牙和磨牙部位的差异明显更大。在正面视图中,光学方法产生的旋转偏差明显大于物理方法。结果表明,光学咬合记录在单个后牙修复的尺寸精度方面是有效的。