School of Social Work, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 24;12:897. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-897.
We examined the mediating effects of health insurance on poverty-colon cancer care and survival relationships and the moderating effects of poverty on health insurance-colon cancer care and survival relationships among women and men in California.
We analyzed registry data for 3,291 women and 3,009 men diagnosed with colon cancer between 1996 and 2000 and followed until 2011 on lymph node investigation, stage at diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy, wait times and survival. We obtained socioeconomic data for individual residences from the 2000 census to categorize the following neighborhoods: high poverty (30% or more poor), middle poverty (5-29% poor) and low poverty (less than 5% poor). Primary health insurers were Medicaid, Medicare, private or none.
Evidence of mediation was observed for women, but not for men. For women, the apparent effect of poverty disappeared in the presence of payer, and the effects of all forms of health insurance seemed strengthened. All were advantaged on 6-year survival compared to the uninsured: Medicaid (RR = 1.83), Medicare (RR = 1.92) and private (RR = 1.83). Evidence of moderation was also only observed for women. The effects of all forms of health insurance were stronger for women in low poverty neighborhoods: Medicaid (RR = 2.90), Medicare (RR = 2.91) and private (RR = 2.60). For men, only main effects of poverty and payers were observed, the advantaging effect of private insurance being largest. Across colon cancer care processes, Medicare seemed most instrumental for women, private payers for men.
Health insurance substantially mediates the quality of colon cancer care and poverty seems to make the effects of being uninsured or underinsured even worse, especially among women in the United States. These findings are consistent with the theory that more facilitative social and economic capital is available in more affluent neighborhoods, where women with colon cancer may be better able to absorb the indirect and direct, but uncovered, costs of care.
我们研究了医疗保险对贫困-结肠癌治疗和生存关系的中介作用,以及贫困对加利福尼亚州女性和男性的医疗保险-结肠癌治疗和生存关系的调节作用。
我们分析了 1996 年至 2000 年间诊断为结肠癌的 3291 名女性和 3009 名男性的登记数据,并在 2011 年之前对淋巴结检查、诊断时的分期、手术、化疗、等待时间和生存情况进行了随访。我们从 2000 年的人口普查中获得了个人居住地点的社会经济数据,将以下社区分为高贫困(30%或以上贫困)、中贫困(5-29%贫困)和低贫困(贫困率低于 5%)。主要的医疗保险包括医疗补助、医疗保险、私人保险或没有保险。
女性有证据表明存在中介作用,但男性没有。对于女性,在存在支付者的情况下,贫困的影响似乎消失了,所有形式的医疗保险的影响似乎都得到了加强。与未参保者相比,所有参保者在 6 年生存率方面都有优势:医疗补助(RR=1.83)、医疗保险(RR=1.92)和私人保险(RR=1.83)。仅在女性中观察到调节作用的证据。在低贫困社区,所有形式的医疗保险对女性的影响更强:医疗补助(RR=2.90)、医疗保险(RR=2.91)和私人保险(RR=2.60)。对于男性,仅观察到贫困和支付者的主要效应,私人保险的优势最大。在结肠癌治疗过程中,医疗保险对女性似乎最有效,私人支付者对男性最有效。
医疗保险在很大程度上调节了结肠癌治疗的质量,贫困似乎使未参保或参保不足的影响更加严重,尤其是在美国的女性中。这些发现与这样一种理论是一致的,即在较富裕的社区,存在更多的促进性社会和经济资本,女性结肠癌患者可能更有能力承担治疗的间接和直接但未涵盖的费用。