Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont.
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):317-323. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3846.
There have been substantial improvements in the early detection, treatment, and survival from cancer in the United States, but it is not clear to what extent patients with different types of health insurance have benefitted from these advancements.
To examine trends in cancer survival by health insurance status from January 1997 to December 2014.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: California Cancer Registry (a statewide cancer surveillance system) data were used to estimate population-based survival by health insurance status in 3 calendar periods: January 1997 to December 2002, January 2003 to December 2008, and January 2009 to December 2014 with follow-up through 2014. Overall, 1 149 891 patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer, or melanoma in California were included in the study.
Five-year all-cause and cancer-specific survival probabilities by insurance category and calendar period for each cancer site and sex; hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for each insurance category (none, Medicare, other public) compared with private insurance in each calendar period.
According to data from 1 149 891 patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer, or melanoma gathered from the California Cancer Registry, improvements in survival were almost exclusively limited to patients with private or Medicare insurance. For patients with other public or no insurance, survival was largely unchanged or declined. Relative to privately insured patients, cancer-specific mortality was higher in uninsured patients for all cancers except prostate, and disparities were largest from 2009 to 2014 for breast (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.45-2.03), lung (men: HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31 and women: HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.50), and colorectal cancer (women: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62). Mortality was also higher for patients with other public insurance for all cancers except lung, and disparities were largest from 2009 to 2014 for breast (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34), prostate (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31), and colorectal cancer (men: HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.23 and women: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20).
After accounting for patient and clinical characteristics, survival disparities for men with prostate cancer and women with lung or colorectal cancer increased significantly over time, reflecting a lack of improvement in survival for patients with other public or no insurance. To mitigate these growing disparities, all patients with cancer need access to health insurance that covers all the necessary elements of health care, from prevention and early detection to timely treatment according to clinical guidelines.
在美国,癌症的早期检测、治疗和存活率都有了显著提高,但尚不清楚不同类型医疗保险的患者在多大程度上受益于这些进步。
检查 1997 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间,不同医疗保险状态下癌症患者的生存率变化趋势。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究使用加利福尼亚癌症登记处(一个全州范围的癌症监测系统)的数据,按医疗保险状态在三个日历期间(1997 年 1 月至 2002 年 12 月、2003 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月和 2009 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月)对人群进行基于生存的估计,随访至 2014 年。共有 1149891 名在加利福尼亚州被诊断患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌或黑色素瘤的患者纳入了本研究。
每个癌症部位和性别的按保险类别和日历期划分的 5 年全因和癌症特异性生存率概率;每个日历期间(无保险、医疗保险、其他公共保险)与私人保险相比的危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
根据来自加利福尼亚癌症登记处的 1149891 名被诊断患有乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌或黑色素瘤的患者的数据,生存的改善几乎完全仅限于私人或医疗保险患者。对于其他公共保险或无保险的患者,生存状况基本保持不变或下降。与私人保险患者相比,除前列腺癌外,所有癌症患者的癌症特异性死亡率在未参保患者中均较高,且 2009 年至 2014 年乳腺癌(HR,1.72;95%CI,1.45-2.03)、肺癌(男性:HR,1.18;95%CI,1.06-1.31;女性:HR,1.32;95%CI,1.15-1.50)和结直肠癌(女性:HR,1.30;95%CI,1.05-1.62)的差异最大。除肺癌外,所有癌症患者的其他公共保险患者的死亡率也较高,且 2009 年至 2014 年乳腺癌(HR,1.25;95%CI,1.17-1.34)、前列腺癌(HR,1.17;95%CI,1.04-1.31)和结直肠癌(男性:HR,1.16;95%CI,1.08-1.23;女性:HR,1.11;95%CI,1.03-1.20)的差异最大。
在考虑患者和临床特征后,男性前列腺癌患者和女性肺癌或结直肠癌患者的生存差异随着时间的推移显著增加,反映出其他公共保险或无保险患者的生存状况没有改善。为了缓解这些日益严重的差距,所有癌症患者都需要获得医疗保险,涵盖从预防和早期发现到根据临床指南及时治疗的所有必要医疗保健要素。