Suppr超能文献

[老年人的人格与人格障碍:诊断、病程及管理]

[Personality and personality disorders in the elderly: diagnostic, course and management].

作者信息

Amad A, Geoffroy P A, Vaiva G, Thomas P

机构信息

Pôle de psychiatrie, université Lille Nord de France, CHRU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2013 Oct;39(5):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about personality and personality disorders in the elderly. This paper summarizes the literature in these fields.

METHODS

Articles were selected using a Medline and Google Scholar search. The keywords were personality, personality disorder, aging and elderly.

RESULTS

Personality is not fixed and can change across the life-time including in the elderly. Personality disorders are frequent with a prevalence estimated between 10 and 20%. These rates are essentially equivalent to that of younger groups. Clinical presentation of these disorders may change over time. Longitudinal observations generally support that the "immature" personality disorders (cluster B), show improvement over time, while the more "mature" (clusters A and C) are characterized by a more chronic course. Many patients with late onset schizophrenia or delusional disorder have a premorbid cluster A personality. Patients with cluster C personality are also stable, and exposed, like all other personality disorders, to depression. Studies suggest that personality disorders may attenuate, re-emerge or appear de novo according to the cluster and the social context. Diagnosing personality disorders in the elderly is a complex undertaking, largely because of the difficulty encountered in distinguishing functional impairments related to personality from those related to physiological and environmental aspects of aging. Tools for assessing personality disorders exist, but there is no ideal assessment instrument for geriatric personality disorders. Psychiatric history and biographical elements have to be collected accurately. Personality disorders may seriously complicate mental and physical health and quality of life. Indeed, a greater risk of depression, suicide, dementia and social isolation is shown in this population. Different types of caring and treatment exist including psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Pharmacological strategies should consider augmentation with psychotherapeutic strategies. Interventions should target the predominant presenting problems. Indeed, personality disordered elderly people are a heterogeneous group with frequent axis I comorbidities. Care should be taken on how to administer pharmacological treatment (risk of noncompliance or abuse), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and finally interaction with age-specific comorbidities. Psychotherapy has shown its effectiveness notably in the management of depression. In institutions, clinical identification of a personality disorder would inform and advise staff regarding the approach to be adopted, and also avoid negative countertransference, emphasizing the pathological aspect of the subject's personality and his/her suffering.

CONCLUSION

Future research should develop adapted and specific diagnosis tools (dimensional and categorical mixed approach), prevention and caring in the elder population. Those studies would be able to determine the link between normal and pathological personality, mortality, depression and dementia.

摘要

目的

人们对老年人的人格及人格障碍了解甚少。本文总结了这些领域的文献。

方法

通过检索医学文献数据库(Medline)和谷歌学术来选取文章。关键词为人格、人格障碍、衰老和老年人。

结果

人格并非固定不变,在整个生命周期包括老年期都可能发生变化。人格障碍很常见,患病率估计在10%至20%之间。这些比率与年轻群体基本相当。这些障碍的临床表现可能随时间而改变。纵向观察总体上支持,“不成熟”的人格障碍(B组)随时间推移会有所改善,而更“成熟”的(A组和C组)则具有更慢性的病程。许多晚发性精神分裂症或妄想障碍患者病前具有A组人格。C组人格的患者也较为稳定,并且与所有其他人格障碍患者一样,易患抑郁症。研究表明,人格障碍可能会根据组别和社会背景而减轻、再次出现或新发。在老年人中诊断人格障碍是一项复杂的工作,很大程度上是因为难以区分与人格相关的功能损害和与衰老的生理及环境方面相关的功能损害。存在评估人格障碍的工具,但没有针对老年人人格障碍的理想评估工具。必须准确收集精神病史和个人经历要素。人格障碍可能会严重影响身心健康和生活质量。事实上,该人群中抑郁症、自杀、痴呆和社会隔离的风险更高。存在不同类型的护理和治疗方法,包括心理治疗和药物治疗。药物治疗策略应考虑与心理治疗策略相结合。干预措施应针对主要的现存问题。的确,患有老年人人格障碍的人群是一个异质性群体,常伴有轴I共病。在药物治疗的给药方式(不依从或滥用风险)、药代动力学、药效学以及最终与特定年龄共病的相互作用方面应予以注意。心理治疗在抑郁症的管理中已显示出其有效性。在机构中,人格障碍的临床识别将为工作人员提供有关应采取的方法的信息并给予建议,还能避免负面的反移情,强调个体人格的病理方面及其痛苦。

结论

未来的研究应开发适用于老年人群体的特定诊断工具(维度和分类混合方法)、预防措施和护理方法。这些研究将能够确定正常人格与病理人格、死亡率、抑郁症和痴呆之间的联系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验