• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声解剖与传统解剖技术在胰腺手术中的应用比较:一项随机多中心研究。

Ultrasonic dissection versus conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery: a randomized multicentre study.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):675-9; discussion 679-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318271cefa.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318271cefa
PMID:23095609
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

: This prospective randomized multicenter trial was performed to assess the potential benefits of ultrasonic energy dissection compared with conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND

: Surgical procedures for tumors of the pancreatic head involve time-consuming manual dissection. The primary hypothesis was that use of ultrasonic tissue and vessel dissection would lead to substantial saving in operative time during pancreatic resection.

METHODS

: Patients eligible for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD) were randomized to group A (dissection with ultrasonic device) or group B (conventional dissection) from March 2009 to May 2011. The primary endpoint was overall duration of operation time. Secondary endpoints were time to end of resection phase, intraoperative blood loss, number of transfused units of blood, and postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

: Analysis of primary and secondary endpoints included 101 patients, who received either PD or PPPD. Demographical characteristics and clinical parameters were similar in both groups. The use of an ultrasonic dissection device did not significantly reduce overall operation time (median 316 minutes in group A and 319 minutes in group B, P = 0.95) and did not significantly increase the costs of surgery. Analysis of secondary endpoints revealed no difference in postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

: Tissue dissection and vessel closure using an ultrasonic device is equivalent to dissection with conventional techniques in pancreatic surgery.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性随机多中心试验旨在评估与传统分离技术相比,超声能量分离在胰腺手术中的潜在益处。

背景

胰腺头部肿瘤的手术程序涉及耗时的手动分离。主要假设是使用超声组织和血管分离将导致胰腺切除术中手术时间的大量节省。

方法

从 2009 年 3 月至 2011 年 5 月,符合胰十二指肠切除术(PD)或保留幽门 PD(PPPD)条件的患者被随机分为 A 组(超声设备分离)或 B 组(常规分离)。主要终点是手术时间的总持续时间。次要终点是切除阶段结束时间、术中失血量、输血量和术后发病率。

结果

对主要和次要终点的分析包括 101 名接受 PD 或 PPPD 的患者。两组患者的人口统计学特征和临床参数相似。使用超声分离装置不会显著减少总手术时间(A 组中位数 316 分钟,B 组中位数 319 分钟,P = 0.95),也不会显著增加手术成本。对次要终点的分析显示术后过程无差异。

结论

在胰腺手术中,使用超声设备进行组织分离和血管闭合与传统技术相当。

相似文献

1
Ultrasonic dissection versus conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery: a randomized multicentre study.超声解剖与传统解剖技术在胰腺手术中的应用比较:一项随机多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):675-9; discussion 679-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318271cefa.
2
Harmonic scalpel versus conventional dissection technique in pylorus-preserving partial duodenopancreatectomy.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术的超声刀与传统解剖技术的比较。
Dig Surg. 2012;29(5):420-5. doi: 10.1159/000345581. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy: safety and long-term results.胰头切除联合十二指肠节段切除术:安全性及长期结果
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):923-8; discussion 929-31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c2a14.
4
Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术与标准胰十二指肠切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):603-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01074.x.
5
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure.胰头癌的胰十二指肠切除术:保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术与惠普尔手术对比
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Sep-Oct;52(65):1601-4.
6
LigaSure™ vs. conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery--a prospective randomised single-centre trial.LigaSure™ 与传统解剖技术在胰腺手术中的比较--一项前瞻性随机单中心试验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):494-500. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2107-z. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
7
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease.腹腔镜辅助与开放保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围疾病的比较。
Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.025. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial study.标准惠普尔手术与保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术:一项随机对照试验研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):693-8.
9
Ultrasonic Dissection Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques in Pancreatic Surgery: A Randomized Multicentre Study.胰腺手术中超声解剖与传统解剖技术的比较:一项随机多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):e150. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000389.
10
Comparison of pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the pancreatic head.胰头切除术与保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头部良性和低度恶性肿瘤的比较。
Pancreas. 2011 Nov;40(8):1258-63. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318220b1c0.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality assurance of surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer: systematic review of multicentre randomized clinical trials.胰腺癌手术干预的质量保证:多中心随机临床试验的系统评价
BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf082.
2
Treatment strategies to prevent or mitigate the outcome of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a review of randomized trials.预防或减轻胰十二指肠切除术后出血后果的治疗策略:随机试验综述
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6145-6154. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000876.
3
High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica).
不同手术环境中的高能设备:SICE(意大利内镜外科学会)完成的全面卫生技术评估报告中的经验教训。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2548-2565. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09734-5. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
4
Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial.超声刀在胃癌手术中应用的肿瘤学安全性:随机对照试验的长期结果
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;30(5):492-499. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02.
5
Procedure costs associated with the use of Harmonic devices compared to conventional techniques in various surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统技术相比,在各种手术中使用谐波设备的手术成本:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jul 24;10:399-412. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S164747. eCollection 2018.
6
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection.机器人辅助胰腺十二指肠切除术伴血管切除
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec;401(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1499-8. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
Ultrasonic Dissection versus Conventional Dissection for Pancreatic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.超声解剖与传统解剖在胰腺手术中的应用:一项Meta分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6195426. doi: 10.1155/2016/6195426. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
8
Resection margin clearance in pancreatic cancer after implementation of the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP): clinically relevant or just academic?实施利兹病理协议(LEEPP)后胰腺癌的切缘清除情况:与临床相关还是仅具有学术意义?
World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):493-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2808-4.