Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 LeConte Ave., Rm 18-251 Semel, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7039, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2013 Apr;36(2):175-84; discussion 184-5. doi: 10.1007/s10143-012-0432-z. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Ten percent of all strokes occurring in the USA are caused by intracranial arterial stenosis (IAS). Symptomatic IAS carries one of the highest rates of recurrent stroke despite intensive medical therapy (25 % in high-risk groups). Clinical results for endovascular angioplasty and stenting have been disappointing. The objectives of this study were to review the contemporary understanding of symptomatic IAS and present potential alternative treatments to resolve factors not addressed by current therapies. We performed a literature review on IAS pathophysiology, natural history, and current treatment. We present an evaluation of the currently deficient aspects in its treatment and explore the role of alternative surgical approaches. There is a well-documented interrelation between hemodynamic and embolic factors in cerebral ischemia caused by IAS. Despite the effectiveness of medical therapy, hemodynamic factors are not addressed satisfactorily by medications alone. Collateral circulation and severity of stenosis are the strongest predictors of risk for stroke and death. Indirect revascularization techniques, such as encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis, offer an alternative treatment to enhance collateral circulation while minimizing risk of hemorrhage associated with hyperemia and endovascular manipulation, with promising results in preliminary studies on chronic cerebrovascular occlusive disease. Despite improvements in medical management for IAS, relevant aspects of its pathophysiology are not resolved by medical treatment alone, such as poor collateral circulation. Surgical indirect revascularization can improve collateral circulation and play a role in the treatment of this condition. Further formal evaluation of indirect revascularization for IAS is a logical and worthy step in the development of intracranial atherosclerosis treatment strategies.
美国发生的中风病例中有 10%是由颅内动脉狭窄(Intracranial Arterial Stenosis,IAS)引起的。尽管进行了强化药物治疗,症状性 IAS 的复发率仍然很高(高危人群中为 25%)。血管内成形术和支架置入术的临床效果并不理想。本研究旨在回顾症状性 IAS 的当代认识,并提出潜在的替代治疗方法,以解决当前治疗方法未涉及的因素。我们对 IAS 的病理生理学、自然史和当前治疗方法进行了文献回顾。我们评估了目前治疗方法中存在的不足之处,并探讨了替代手术方法的作用。IAS 引起的脑缺血中,血流动力学和栓塞因素之间存在着有据可查的相互关系。尽管药物治疗有效,但血流动力学因素不能仅通过药物得到充分解决。侧支循环和狭窄程度是中风和死亡风险的最强预测因素。间接血运重建技术,如脑-硬脑膜-动脉血管融通术,提供了一种替代治疗方法,可在最小化与充血和血管内操作相关的出血风险的同时增强侧支循环,在慢性脑血管闭塞性疾病的初步研究中取得了有前景的结果。尽管 IAS 的药物治疗有所改善,但药物治疗并不能解决其病理生理学的相关方面,例如侧支循环不良。手术间接血运重建可以改善侧支循环,在这种情况下发挥作用。进一步对 IAS 的间接血运重建进行正式评估是颅内动脉粥样硬化治疗策略发展中的合理且有价值的步骤。