Ausman James I, Liebeskind David S, Gonzalez Nestor, Saver Jeffrey, Martin Neil, Villablanca J Pablo, Vespa Paul, Duckwiler Gary, Jahan Reza, Niu Tianyi, Salamon Noriko, Yoo Bryan, Tateshima Satoshi, Buitrago Blanco Manuel M, Starkman Sidney
Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 May 24;9:106. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_373_17. eCollection 2018.
We have reviewed the English literature published in the last 70 years on Diseases of the Vertebral Basilar Circulation, or Posterior Circulation Disease (PCD). We have found that errors have been made in the conduct and interpretation of these studies that have led to incorrect approaches to the management of PCD. Because of the difficulty in evaluating the PC, the management of PCD has been incorrectly applied from anterior circulation disease (ACD) experience to PCD. PCD is a common form of stroke affecting 20-40% patients with stroke. Yet, the evidence is strong that the Anterior Circulation (AC) and Posterior Circulations (PC) differ in their pathology, in their clinical presentations, in the rapidity of development of symptoms, in optimal imaging methods, and in available treatments. There appears to be two categories of patients who present with PCD. The first, acute basilar artery occlusion has a more rapid onset. The diagnosis must be made quickly and if imaging proves a diagnosis of Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO), the treatment of choice is Interventional removal of the basilar artery thrombosis or embolus. The second category of PCD and the most commonly seen PCD disease process presents with non-specific symptoms and early warnings of PCD that now can be related to ischemic events in the entire PC vessels. These warning symptoms and signs occur much earlier than those in the AC. IA angiography is still the gold standard of diagnosis and is superior in definition to MR and CT angiography which are commonly used as a convenient screening imaging tool to evaluate PCD but are both inferior to IA angiography in definition for lesions below 3-4 mm. In at least two reported studies 7T MR angiography appears superior to other imaging modalities and will become the gold standard of imaging of PCD in the future. Medical treatments applied to the ACD have not been proven of value in specific forms of PCD. Interventional therapy was promising but of unproven value in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) except for the treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO). Surgical revascularization has been proved to be highly successful in patients, who are refractory to medical therapy. These studies have been ignored by the scientific community basically because of an incorrect interpretation of the flawed EC-IC Bypass Trial in 1985 as applying to all stroke patients. Moreover, the EC-IC Bypass Study did not include PCD patients in their study population, but the study results were extrapolated to patients with PCD without any scientific basis. This experience led clinicians to an incorrect bias that surgical treatments are of no value in PCD. Thus, incorrectly, surgical treatments of PCD have not been considered among the therapeutic possibilities for PCD. QMRA is a new quantitative MR technique that measures specific blood flow in extra and intracranial vessels. QMRA has been used to select those patients who may benefit from medical, or interventional, or surgical treatment for PCD based on flow determinations with a high success rate. QMRA accurately predicts the flows in many large and small vessels in the PC and AC and clearly indicates that both circulations are intimately related. From medical and surgical studies, the longer one waits for surgical treatment the higher the risk of a poor outcome results. This observation becomes obvious when the rapidity of development of PCD is compared with ACD. Recent advances in endovascular therapy in the treatment of acute basilar thrombosis is a clear sign that early diagnosis and treatment of PCD will reduce the morbidity and mortality of these diseases. In this review it is evident that there are multiple medical and surgical treatments for PCD depending upon the location of the lesion(s) and the collateral circulation demonstrated. It is clear that the AC and PC have significant differences. With the exception of the large population studies from Oxford England, the reported studies on the management of PCD in the literature represent small selected subsets of the universe of PC diseases, the information from which is not generalizable to the universe of PCD patients. At this point in the history of PCD, there are not large enough databases of similar patients to provide a basis for valid randomized studies, with the exception of the surgical studies. Thus, a high index of suspicion of the early warning symptoms of PCD should lead to a rapid individual clinical assessment of patients selecting those with PCD. Medical, interventional, and/or surgical treatments should be chosen based on knowledge presented in this review. Recording the results in a national Registry on a continuing basis will provide the data that may help advance the management of PCD based on larger data bases of well documented patient information to guide the selection of future therapies for PCD treatments. It is also clear that the management of patients within the complex of diseases that comprise PCD should be performed in centers with expertise in the imaging, medical, interventional and surgical approaches to diseases of the PCD.
我们回顾了过去70年发表的关于椎基底动脉循环疾病或后循环疾病(PCD)的英文文献。我们发现,这些研究在开展和解读过程中存在错误,导致对PCD的治疗方法出现错误。由于评估后循环存在困难,PCD的治疗一直错误地从前循环疾病(ACD)的经验应用到PCD。PCD是一种常见的中风形式,影响20%-40%的中风患者。然而,有充分证据表明,前循环(AC)和后循环(PC)在病理、临床表现、症状发展速度、最佳成像方法以及可用治疗方法等方面存在差异。出现PCD的患者似乎有两类。第一类,急性基底动脉闭塞起病更快。必须迅速做出诊断,如果影像学检查证实为基底动脉闭塞(BAO),首选治疗方法是通过介入手段清除基底动脉血栓或栓子。第二类PCD也是最常见的PCD疾病过程,表现为非特异性症状和PCD的早期预警,现在这些症状和预警可与整个PC血管的缺血事件相关。这些预警症状和体征比AC出现得早得多。IA血管造影仍是诊断的金标准,其清晰度优于MR和CT血管造影,MR和CT血管造影通常用作评估PCD的便捷筛查成像工具,但对于3-4mm以下的病变,其清晰度均不如IA血管造影。在至少两项报道的研究中,7T MR血管造影似乎优于其他成像方式,未来将成为PCD成像的金标准。应用于ACD的药物治疗在特定形式的PCD中尚未被证明有价值。介入治疗前景广阔,但在随机对照试验(RCT)中,除了治疗基底动脉闭塞(BAO)外,其价值尚未得到证实。手术血运重建已被证明在药物治疗无效的患者中非常成功。这些研究基本上被科学界忽视了,主要是因为对1985年有缺陷的EC-IC搭桥试验的错误解读,认为该试验适用于所有中风患者。此外,EC-IC搭桥研究在其研究人群中未纳入PCD患者,但研究结果却在没有任何科学依据的情况下被外推到PCD患者身上。这种经历导致临床医生产生了一种错误的偏见,即手术治疗对PCD没有价值。因此,PCD的手术治疗被错误地排除在PCD的治疗可能性之外。QMRA是一种新的定量MR技术,可测量颅外和颅内血管中的特定血流量。QMRA已被用于根据血流测定结果选择可能从PCD的药物、介入或手术治疗中获益的患者,成功率很高。QMRA能准确预测PC和AC中许多大、小血管的血流情况,并清楚地表明两个循环密切相关。从医学和外科研究来看,等待手术治疗的时间越长,预后不良的风险就越高。将PCD的发展速度与ACD进行比较时,这一观察结果就变得很明显。急性基底动脉血栓形成的血管内治疗的最新进展清楚地表明,PCD的早期诊断和治疗将降低这些疾病的发病率和死亡率。在本综述中很明显,根据病变位置和所显示的侧支循环情况,PCD有多种药物和手术治疗方法。很明显,AC和PC有显著差异。除了英国牛津的大型人群研究外,文献中报道的关于PCD治疗的研究仅代表PC疾病总体中的一小部分特定子集,从中获得的信息不能推广到所有PCD患者。在PCD发展的这个阶段,除了外科研究外,没有足够大的类似患者数据库来为有效的随机研究提供依据。因此,对PCD早期预警症状的高度怀疑应促使对患者进行快速的个体临床评估,以筛选出患有PCD的患者。应根据本综述中提供的知识选择药物、介入和/或手术治疗。持续在国家登记处记录结果将提供数据,这些数据可能有助于基于记录完善的患者信息的更大数据库推进PCD的治疗,以指导未来PCD治疗方法的选择。同样明显的是,对于构成PCD的复杂疾病患者的管理,应该在具备PCD疾病成像、医学、介入和手术治疗专业知识的中心进行。