• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The EU's system for regulating medical devices.

作者信息

McCulloch Peter

出版信息

BMJ. 2012 Oct 24;345:e7126. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7126.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.e7126
PMID:23097545
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The EU's system for regulating medical devices.欧盟医疗器械监管体系。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 24;345:e7126. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7126.
2
[EU's licitation rules are deteriorating for the health].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 May 24;166(22):2174-5.
3
The regulation of medical devices.医疗器械的监管
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2822. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2822.
4
Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.欧洲医疗器械的卫生技术评估。必须考虑的因素。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):733-40.
5
Europeans are left to their own devices.欧洲人只能自行其是。
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2748.
6
Commentary: Evaluating and regulating device therapy.评论：评估和规范设备治疗。
BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2839.
7
EU's proposed policies are unfair and unsafe.
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(19):1234.
8
Time to rebuild Iraq.
Med Device Technol. 2003 Jun;14(5):34.
9
Selecting medical devices and materials for development in Korea: the analytic hierarchy process approach.韩国医疗设备及材料研发的选型：层次分析法
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Apr-Jun;18(2):161-74. doi: 10.1002/hpm.703.
10
Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular devices: principles, problems, and proposals for European regulatory reform. Report of a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology.心血管器械的临床评估：欧洲监管改革的原则、问题和建议。欧洲心脏病学会政策会议报告。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(13):1673-86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr171. Epub 2011 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for action by evaluators and decision makers in Europe to ensure safe use of medical software.欧洲的评估人员和决策者需要采取行动，以确保医疗软件的安全使用。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Nov 29;4:1063622. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1063622. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient safety incidents in dentomaxillofacial imaging: reported adverse events from Hospital District Helsinki and Uusimaa and the City of Helsinki during 2012-2017.2012-2017 年赫尔辛基大区和赫尔辛基市牙颌面影像学中的患者安全事件：报告的不良事件。
Oral Radiol. 2023 Jan;39(1):164-172. doi: 10.1007/s11282-022-00616-z. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Outcomes, Interventions and Funding in Randomised Research Published in High-Impact Journals.
发表于高影响力期刊的随机研究中的结果、干预措施及资金情况。
Trials. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2978-8.
4
Drugs and Devices: Comparison of European and U.S. Approval Processes.药物与器械：欧洲和美国审批流程之比较
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016 Aug 29;1(5):399-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.003. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies.为新医疗技术创造价值：企业家、投资者和监管机构的早期贡献。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Sep 1;6(9):509-518. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.11.
6
Comparison of rates of safety issues and reporting of trial outcomes for medical devices approved in the European Union and United States: cohort study.欧盟和美国批准的医疗器械安全问题发生率及试验结果报告的比较：队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i3323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3323.
7
Ensuring medical device effectiveness and safety: a cross--national comparison of approaches to regulation.确保医疗设备的有效性和安全性：监管方法的跨国比较。
Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(1):1-23, i.
8
Regulation of medicines and medical devices: contrasts and similarities.药品和医疗器械监管：对比与相似之处。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Feb;14(1):6-12. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-1-6.
9
Primary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature.原发性髋关节置换假体及其证据基础：文献系统综述。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 19;347:f6956. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6956.
10
"Spin" in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes.伤口护理研究中的“倾向性报道”：对主要结局结果无统计学显著性或主要结局未明确指定的随机对照试验的报告与解读
Trials. 2013 Nov 6;14:371. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-371.