Centre of Functional Imaging and Research, Department of Clinical Physiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2013 Feb;73(1):42-7. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2012.734395. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Patients with cirrhosis often present with an abnormal distribution of blood volume with a reduced central blood volume (CBV) and central circulation time (CCT). In this group of patients it is important to determine the central haemodynamics as accurately as possible. The purpose of the present study was to compare an alternative injection technique by injecting technetium-labelled human serum albumin ((99m)Tc-HSA) from a deposit within the catheter lumen with the conventional injection technique by injecting iodine-labelled human serum albumin ((125)I-HSA) directly from a syringe.
In 192 patients with cirrhosis, CCT, CBV, and cardiac output (CO) were determined according to kinetic principles. Injection of the two radiolabelled HSA were performed simultaneously and followed by arterial blood sampling every second for the first minute.
CCT was significantly shorter, and CO and CBV were significantly lower when determined by the alternative catheter deposit injection technique compared to determination by the traditional syringe deposit injection technique. The mean difference (bias) between CCT measured with the two methods was 0.38 s with limits of agreement ranging from - 0.83 s to 1.59 s.
This study demonstrates that different injection techniques result in a minor but significant difference of the measured haemodynamics. When highly accurate measurements of the central haemodynamics are needed, we recommend using the alternative injection technique by injection of the indicator from a deposit within the catheter in order to reduce overestimation of CCT.
肝硬化患者常伴有血容量分布异常,表现为中心血容量(CBV)和中央循环时间(CCT)减少。在这群患者中,准确确定中央血液动力学非常重要。本研究的目的是比较一种替代注射技术,即将锝标记的人血清白蛋白((99m)Tc-HSA)从导管腔中的沉积物中注入,与传统的从注射器中直接注入碘标记的人血清白蛋白((125)I-HSA)的注射技术。
在 192 例肝硬化患者中,根据动力学原理确定 CCT、CBV 和心输出量(CO)。同时进行两种放射性标记的 HSA 注射,然后在最初的一分钟内每隔一秒进行动脉血样采集。
与传统注射器沉积注射技术相比,替代导管沉积注射技术的 CCT 明显缩短,CO 和 CBV 明显降低。两种方法测量的 CCT 之间的平均差异(偏倚)为 0.38 秒,一致性界限范围为-0.83 秒至 1.59 秒。
本研究表明,不同的注射技术会导致测量的血液动力学结果存在轻微但显著的差异。当需要进行高度准确的中央血液动力学测量时,我们建议使用替代注射技术,即从导管内的沉积物中注入指示剂,以减少 CCT 的高估。