Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School-Hadassah Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91031, Israel.
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Budget restrictions have led to shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) beds in several countries. Consequently, ventilated patients are often kept on the wards. This study examined survival likelihood among patients ventilated on the wards and the predictive value of commonly used severity-of-illness scores.
This study is a prospective observation and characterization of consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients in 3 internal medicine wards of a single hospital who were denied ICU admission. Outcome measures are as follows: 28-day mortality, survival to hospital discharge, and 3 months postdischarge.
Eighty-six patients were examined. The patients were 78.9 ± 8.9 years old; 53% were independent preadmission. Respiratory insufficiency due to infection was the main reason for mechanical ventilation (58%). Charlson and acute physiology scores (APS) averaged 4 ± 2.2 and 91.8 ± 26.7, respectively. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 71%, whereas in-hospital mortality was 74% and 3 months postdischarge mortality was 79%. Survivors were significantly younger than nonsurvivors (74.4 ± 8.5 years vs 80.4 ± 8.6 years, P < .01), were more likely to be ventilated for cardiac causes (41% vs 11%, P = .04), and had significantly higher initial mean blood pressure (79.4 mm Hg vs 58.2 mm Hg, P = .02) and blood albumin levels (29.8 g/L vs 25.7 g/L, P = .05). Death rate was 10 times more likely, with an APS greater than 90 on the day of intubation as compared with an APS less than 90.
Mortality in patients ventilated on the ward was high, especially in the subgroup of patients with an APS score greater than 90. The early calculation of APS may assist in focusing therapeutic efforts on patients with better survival chances.
预算限制导致一些国家的重症监护病房(ICU)床位短缺。因此,许多需要通气支持的患者被留在病房。本研究旨在评估在病房中接受通气支持的患者的生存可能性,并分析常用疾病严重程度评分的预测价值。
本研究为前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了某医院 3 个内科病房中连续的、需要机械通气但未转入 ICU 的患者。观察指标包括 28 天死亡率、住院期间死亡率和出院后 3 个月死亡率。
共纳入 86 例患者,年龄为(78.9 ± 8.9)岁,53%的患者在入院前生活能够自理。导致机械通气的主要原因是感染引起的呼吸功能不全(58%)。Charlson 合并急性生理学评分(APS)分别为 4 ± 2.2 分和 91.8 ± 26.7 分。28 天死亡率为 71%,住院期间死亡率为 74%,出院后 3 个月死亡率为 79%。存活组患者明显比死亡组患者年轻(74.4 ± 8.5 岁 vs 80.4 ± 8.6 岁,P <.01),因心脏原因接受通气治疗的比例更高(41% vs 11%,P =.04),初始平均血压(79.4 mm Hg vs 58.2 mm Hg,P =.02)和血白蛋白水平(29.8 g/L vs 25.7 g/L,P =.05)也更高。与 APS 评分<90 相比,APs 评分>90 时患者的死亡率更高,风险比为 10.0(95%CI:2.1~44.6)。
在病房中接受通气支持的患者死亡率较高,尤其是 APS 评分>90 的患者亚组。尽早计算 APS 评分可能有助于将治疗重点放在生存机会更大的患者身上。