Khan Haseeb Ahmad, Sobki Samia Hasan, Alhomida Abdullah Saleh, Khan Shaukat Ali
Department of Biochemistry College of Science, King Saud University, Bld 5, Room 2A68, P.O. Box 2455 Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2007 Mar;22(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02912884.
This study reports the utilization of serum fructosamine and blood glucose for the screening of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Blood samples from 165 pregnant women were analyzed for fasting blood glucose (FBG), random blood glucose (RBG) and serum fructosamine. The actual fructosamine levels were corrected for serum protein (c-Fruct) for more precise presentation. Two cut-off values of FBG (>5.3 mmol/L and >7.0 mmol/L) and RBG (>7.8 mmol/L and >11.0 mmol/L) were used to classify hyperglycemic subjects for subsequent evaluation. The average values±standard deviations for FBG, RBG and cFruct were 5.865±1.95, 7.767±3.21 and 2.387±0.47 mmol/L, respectively. FBG levels were significantly correlated with RBG (Pearson correlation=0.597, P<0.001). Significant correlations were also observed between cFruct and FBG (Pearson correlation=0.673, P<0.001) or RBG (Pearson correlation=0.641, P<0.001). Out of 165 subjects, 24 (14.5%) cases were classified as hyperglycemic on the basis of FBG>7.0 mmol/L or RBG>11.0 mmol/L; use of lower cut-off values resulted higher frequencies of hyperglycemia. Whereas, a combined criteria of FBG>5.3 mmol/L and cFruct >2.5 mmol/L predicted 35 patients as the most probable hyperglycemic as compared to 32 patients identified using the criteria of RBG >7.8 mmol/L and cFruct >2.5 mmol/L. These criteria were associated with 4.8% and 3.6% false-positivity at the expense of 3.6% and 3.0% false-negative outcomes, respectively. The levels of FBG, RBG and cFruct were significantly higher in hyperglycemic groups (irrespective of grouping criteria) as compared to the respective normal groups. In conclusion, these findings clearly indicate that the paired values of cFruct with FBG or RBG could help in filtering high-risk individuals for OGTT and therefore avoiding a unnecessary OGTT.
本研究报告了利用血清果糖胺和血糖来筛查妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)。对165名孕妇的血样进行空腹血糖(FBG)、随机血糖(RBG)和血清果糖胺分析。为了更精确地呈现,对实际果糖胺水平进行血清蛋白校正(c - Fruct)。使用两个FBG临界值(>5.3 mmol/L和>7.0 mmol/L)以及RBG临界值(>7.8 mmol/L和>11.0 mmol/L)对高血糖受试者进行分类以便后续评估。FBG、RBG和cFruct的平均值±标准差分别为5.865±1.95、7.767±3.21和2.387±0.47 mmol/L。FBG水平与RBG显著相关(Pearson相关系数 = 0.597,P<0.001)。在cFruct与FBG(Pearson相关系数 = 0.673,P<0.001)或RBG之间也观察到显著相关性(Pearson相关系数 = 0.641,P<0.001)。在165名受试者中,24例(14.5%)根据FBG>7.0 mmol/L或RBG>11.0 mmol/L被分类为高血糖;使用较低的临界值导致高血糖频率更高。然而,与使用RBG>7.8 mmol/L和cFruct>2.5 mmol/L标准识别出的32例患者相比,FBG>5.3 mmol/L和cFruct>2.5 mmol/L的联合标准预测出35例最可能的高血糖患者。这些标准分别伴有4.8%和3.6%的假阳性,代价是分别有3.6%和3.0%的假阴性结果。与各自的正常组相比,高血糖组(无论分组标准如何)的FBG、RBG和cFruct水平显著更高。总之,这些发现清楚地表明,cFruct与FBG或RBG的配对值有助于筛选出进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的高危个体,从而避免不必要的OGTT。