Erasmus University Medical Centre, Desiderius School, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):120-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733836. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
There is a need for outcome-based studies on strategies for supporting at-risk medical students that use long-term follow-up and contemporaneous controls.
To measure the effect of a short integrated study skills programme (SSP) on the study progress of at-risk medical students.
First-year students identified as at-risk of academic failure at 7 months after enrolment were invited to participate in the randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the SSP group or to a control group receiving standard academic support. Effects of SSP were measured on the short (passed first exam after intervention), medium (obtained enough credits to proceed to second year) and long term (completed first-year curriculum within 2 years).
SSP participants (n=43) more often passed the first exam after the intervention than controls (n=41; 30% versus 12%; X2(1)=4.06, p<0.005, effect size=0.22), in particular those who had previously passed at least one exam. No medium or long-term effect was found. Participants who had attended four or five SSP sessions outperformed those who had attended fewer sessions on all outcome measures.
A short, integrated SSP benefited some, but not all students. Our advice is to focus support efforts on at-risk students who have demonstrated commitment and academic potential.
需要进行基于结果的研究,以确定支持高危医学生的策略,这些策略需要采用长期随访和同期对照。
测量短期综合学习技巧课程(SSP)对高危医学生学习进展的影响。
在入学 7 个月后,将被确定为学业失败高危的一年级学生邀请参加随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到 SSP 组或对照组,接受标准学术支持。SSP 的效果在短期(干预后通过第一次考试)、中期(获得足够学分进入第二年)和长期(在 2 年内完成第一年课程)进行测量。
与对照组(n=41;30%比 12%;X2(1)=4.06,p<0.005,效应大小=0.22)相比,SSP 参与者(n=43)在干预后通过第一次考试的比例更高,尤其是那些之前通过至少一次考试的学生。未发现中期或长期效果。参加过 4 或 5 次 SSP 课程的参与者在所有结果测量上的表现均优于参加过较少课程的参与者。
短期、综合的 SSP 对一些学生有益,但并非所有学生都受益。我们的建议是将支持努力集中在表现出承诺和学术潜力的高危学生身上。