• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public preferences for government spending in Canada.公众对加拿大政府支出的偏好。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Oct 30;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-64.
2
Government spending on dental care: is it a public priority?政府在牙科保健方面的支出:这是公众的首要任务吗?
J Public Health Dent. 2012 Summer;72(3):246-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00324.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
3
Public preferences for seeking publicly financed dental care and professional preferences for structuring it.公众对寻求公共资助的牙科保健的偏好和专业人士对其结构的偏好。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;38(2):152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00534.x.
4
Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey.让加拿大公众参与罕见病药物报销决策:一项全国性在线调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 26;17(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4.
5
Government and charity funding of cancer research: public preferences and choices.政府与慈善机构对癌症研究的资助:公众偏好与选择
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Sep 3;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0027-6.
6
Health insurance: the Canadian experience.医疗保险:加拿大的经验
AFL CIO Am Fed. 1978 Apr;85(4):11-6.
7
Medicare's Evolution: National Pharmacare and Shared Leadership.医疗保险的演变:国家药物护理与共同领导
Healthc Q. 2019 Jul;22(2):15-19. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2019.25910.
8
Hong Kong's domestic health spending--financial years 1989/90 through 2004/05.香港本地医疗开支——1989/90至2004/05财政年度。
Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Apr;14 Suppl 2:2-23.
9
Canadian opinions on publicly financed dental care.加拿大人对公共资助牙科护理的看法。
Can J Public Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;98(6):495-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03405446.
10
Public views on the role of government in funding and delivering health services.公众对政府在资助和提供医疗服务方面作用的看法。
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Jul;44(5):446-54. doi: 10.1177/1403494816631872. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Potentially preventable hospital use for dental conditions: implications for expanding dental coverage for low income populations.因牙齿疾病而可能可避免的住院治疗:对扩大低收入人群牙科保险覆盖范围的影响
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Aug;22(3):1048-58. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0097.
2
Broadening the base of publicly funded health care.拓宽公共资助医疗保健的基础。
CMAJ. 2011 Mar 22;183(5):E296-300. doi: 10.1503/CMAJ.100999.
3
Examining the implications of dental treatment costs for low-income families.审视牙科治疗费用对低收入家庭的影响。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a28.
4
Oral health disparities and food insecurity in working poor Canadians.加拿大在职贫困人口的口腔健康差异与粮食不安全问题。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;37(4):294-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00479.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
5
Does Equity in Healthcare Use Vary across Canadian Provinces?加拿大各省在医疗保健使用方面的公平性是否存在差异?
Healthc Policy. 2008 May;3(4):83-99.
6
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.优先级设定:何为成功?成功的优先级设定概念框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 5;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-43.
7
Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: implications for policy and practice.加拿大慢性健康状况、合并症及医疗保健使用的人口模式:对政策与实践的影响
Healthc Q. 2008;11(3):70-6. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19859.
8
Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.美国和加拿大的医疗服务可及性、健康状况及健康差距:一项基于全国人口调查的结果
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1300-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059402. Epub 2006 May 30.
9
Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation.设有申诉程序的医院优先次序设定:一项定性案例研究与评估
Health Policy. 2005 Jul;73(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.002. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
10
From neurons to neighborhoods: old and new challenges for developmental and behavioral pediatrics.从神经元到社区:发育与行为儿科学面临的新旧挑战
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003 Feb;24(1):70-6. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200302000-00014.

公众对加拿大政府支出的偏好。

Public preferences for government spending in Canada.

机构信息

Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 1G6, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2012 Oct 30;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-64.

DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-11-64
PMID:23110682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3496632/
Abstract

This study considers three questions: 1. What are the Canadian public's prioritization preferences for new government spending on a range of public health-related goods outside the scope of the country's national system of health insurance? 2. How homogenous or heterogeneous is the Canadian public in terms of these preferences? 3. What factors are predictive of the Canadian public's preferences for new government spending? Data were collected in 2008 from a national random sample of Canadian adults through a telephone interview survey (n=1,005). Respondents were asked to rank five spending priorities in terms of their preference for new government spending. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. As a first priority, Canadian adults prefer spending on child care (26.2%), followed by pharmacare (23.1%), dental care (20.8%), home care (17.2%), and vision care (12.7%). Sociodemographic characteristics predict spending preferences, based on the social position and needs of respondents. Policy leaders need to give fair consideration to public preferences in priority setting approaches in order to ensure that public health-related goods are distributed in a manner that best suits population needs.

摘要

本研究考虑了三个问题

  1. 加拿大公众对超出国家健康保险体系范围的一系列与公共卫生相关的新政府支出的优先排序偏好是什么?2. 就这些偏好而言,加拿大公众的同质性或异质性如何?3. 哪些因素可以预测加拿大公众对新政府支出的偏好?2008 年,通过全国性的随机成人电话访谈调查(n=1005)收集了数据。受访者被要求根据他们对新政府支出的偏好,对五项支出优先事项进行排名。进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。作为第一优先事项,加拿大成年人更倾向于儿童保育(26.2%),其次是药品保险(23.1%)、牙科保健(20.8%)、家庭保健(17.2%)和视力保健(12.7%)。社会人口特征根据受访者的社会地位和需求预测支出偏好。政策制定者需要在优先排序方法中公平考虑公众偏好,以确保以最适合人口需求的方式分配与公共卫生相关的商品。