Allin Sara
Research Officer, LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Healthc Policy. 2008 May;3(4):83-99.
For over 30 years, Canadian provinces have provided universal public insurance for hospital and physician care; however, evidence points to persisting socio-economic inequity in healthcare use. Because provinces hold the responsibility for planning and funding most publicly insured health services, there is some variation in health system characteristics. In the context of such variation, this study systematically investigated equity in healthcare use across the provinces. Drawing on the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey, the author applied the indirect standardization approach to create an index of needs-adjusted inequity in the probability, total and conditional number of GP, specialist, hospital and dentist visits. Results reveal some variation in inequity across provinces; however, national trends show pro-rich inequity in the probability of a GP, specialist and dentist visit, and no significant evidence of inequity in inpatient care. Aside from income, the main socio-economic factors associated with inequity are education, complementary insurance for prescription drugs and dental care and, in some cases, region of residence. When total (and conditional) number of visits are examined, the pro-rich inequity in GP care disappears in all provinces. Differences in the extent of and contributors to inequity that are observed across the provinces suggest a need for more in-depth provincial policy analyses.
30多年来,加拿大各省一直为医院和医生诊疗提供全民公共保险;然而,有证据表明,在医疗保健利用方面,社会经济不平等现象依然存在。由于各省负责规划和资助大多数公共保险的医疗服务,卫生系统特征存在一些差异。在这种差异的背景下,本研究系统地调查了各省在医疗保健利用方面的公平性。作者利用2003年加拿大社区健康调查,采用间接标准化方法,创建了一个需求调整后的不公平指数,用于衡量全科医生、专科医生、医院和牙医诊疗的概率、总数和条件数量。结果显示各省在不公平程度上存在一些差异;然而,全国趋势表明,在看全科医生、专科医生和牙医的概率方面存在有利于富人的不公平现象,而住院治疗方面没有明显的不公平证据。除收入外,与不公平相关的主要社会经济因素是教育、处方药和牙科护理的补充保险,在某些情况下还包括居住地区。当考察诊疗总数(和条件数量)时,全科医疗中有利于富人的不公平现象在所有省份都消失了。各省在不公平程度和促成因素方面的差异表明,需要进行更深入的省级政策分析。