• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Open preperitoneal versus anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized study.开放腹膜前修补术与前路修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的随机研究
BMC Surg. 2012 Oct 30;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-22.
2
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized trial.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝:一项随机试验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;11(2):123-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.153809.
3
Long-term outcome for open preperitoneal mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia.开放式腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的长期疗效。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:134-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Initial experience with application of single layer modified Kugel mesh for inguinal hernia repair: Case series of 72 consecutive patients.单层改良 Kugel 补片应用于腹股沟疝修补术的初步经验:72 例连续患者的病例系列
Asian J Surg. 2017 Apr;40(2):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.08.001. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Recurrent inguinal hernia: preferred operative approach.复发性腹股沟疝:首选手术入路
Am Surg. 1998 Jun;64(6):569-73; discussion 573-4.
6
Laparoscopic repair of recurrent hernias.复发性疝的腹腔镜修补术。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Aug;13(8):807-10. doi: 10.1007/s004649901105.
7
Tailored anterior tension-free repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia previously repaired by anterior approach.量身定制的前路无张力修补术治疗既往采用前路修补的复发性腹股沟疝。
Hernia. 2016 Jun;20(3):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1475-9. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Anterior tension - free repair versus posterior preperitoneal repair for recurrent hernia.复发性疝的前路无张力修补术与后路腹膜前修补术的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Aug;17(8):465-8.
9
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)途径:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):639-49. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1931-7. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
10
The TREPP as alternative technique for recurrent inguinal hernia after Lichtenstein's repair: A consecutive case series.TREPP 作为李金斯坦修补术后复发性腹股沟疝的替代技术:一项连续病例系列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study between open pre-peritoneal approach versus laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair: a prospective cohort study.开放式腹膜前修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的对比研究:前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02967-4. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair has superior 1-year patient-reported outcomes compared to Shouldice non-mesh repair.开放式腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在 1 年患者报告结局方面优于Shouldice 无网片修补术。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02936-3. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
3
Improved patient-reported outcomes after open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared to anterior Lichtenstein repair: 10-year ACHQC analysis.开放式腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与前 Lichtenstein 修补术相比改善了患者报告的结局:ACHQC 10 年分析。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1139-1154. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02852-6. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
4
Minimally access versus conventional hydrocelectomy: a randomized trial.微创与传统鞘膜积液切除术:一项随机试验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):750-6. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0248.
5
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: A randomized trial.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝:一项随机试验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;11(2):123-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.153809.
6
The impact of type of mesh repair on 2nd recurrence after recurrent groin hernia surgery.补片修补类型对复发性腹股沟疝手术后二次复发的影响。
World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):315-22; discussion 323-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2921-4.
7
An innovative repair for a re-recurrence of an incarcerated inguinal hernia.一种针对嵌顿性腹股沟疝复发的创新修复方法。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Nov;96(8):e18-9. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184903081.
8
Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.比较腹腔镜与李金斯坦技术在复发性腹股沟疝修补术中应用的前瞻性随机试验的荟萃分析与综述。
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):355-66. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1281-1. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
9
Modified off-midline closure of pilonidal sinus disease.藏毛窦疾病改良偏中线闭合术
N Am J Med Sci. 2014 May;6(5):210-4. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.132936.

本文引用的文献

1
Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults.丹麦疝气数据库关于成人腹股沟疝和股疝管理的建议。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):C4243.
2
Preperitoneal repair (open posterior approach) for recurrent inguinal hernias previously treated with Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty.腹膜前修补术(开放后路入路)用于既往接受过利希滕斯坦无张力疝修补术治疗的复发性腹股沟疝。
Hippokratia. 2010 Apr;14(2):119-21.
3
Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain.预测疝修补术后持续性疼痛的风险因素。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):957-69. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d31ff8.
4
Testicular infarction as a sequela of inguinal hernia repair.睾丸梗死作为腹股沟疝修补术的后遗症。
Can J Urol. 2009 Dec;16(6):4953-4.
5
Open preperitoneal mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia.开放式腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝。
Hernia. 2009 Dec;13(6):585-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0520-3.
6
Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia--a prospective randomized trial.利希滕斯坦疝修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):384-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318196d0b0.
7
Chronic pain after Lichtenstein and preperitoneal (posterior) hernia repair.利希滕斯坦修补术及腹膜前(后方)疝修补术后的慢性疼痛
Can J Surg. 2008 Oct;51(5):383-7.
8
Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair.复发性腹股沟疝手术后的再复发。一项关于修补类型作用的全国性8年随访研究。
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):707-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b18e3.
9
Orchiectomy as a result of ischemic orchitis after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: case report of a rare complication.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后缺血性睾丸炎导致睾丸切除:罕见并发症的病例报告
Patient Saf Surg. 2007 Nov 7;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-1-3.
10
The impact of pain on daily activities following open mesh inguinal hernia repair.开放网片修补腹股沟疝术后疼痛对日常活动的影响。
Hernia. 2008 Apr;12(2):153-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0297-1. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

开放腹膜前修补术与前路修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的随机研究

Open preperitoneal versus anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized study.

作者信息

Saber Aly, Ellabban Goda M, Gad Mohammad A, Elsayem Karam

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Port-Fouad General Hospital, Port-Fouad, Port-Said, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2012 Oct 30;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-22.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2482-12-22
PMID:23110701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3514268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common general surgical operations, with approximately 15% performed for recurrence. The repair of the resulting recurrent hernia is a daunting task because of already weakened tissues and obscured and distorted anatomy. The aim of this study is to compare the posterior preperitoneal versus anterior tension-free approach for repair of unilateral recurrent inguinal hernia regarding complications and early recurrence.

METHODS

120 Patients in this study were divided randomly into 2 main groups; Group A patients were subjected to posterior preperitoneal approach and those of group B were subjected to conventional anterior tension-free repair. The primary end point was recurrence and the secondary end points were time off from work, postoperative pain, scrotal swelling and wound infections.

RESULTS

The mean hospital stay was 1.2 days and 4.7, the mean time to return work was 8.2 and 11.2 days and the mean time off from work was 9.4 and 15.9 days in group A and B respectively. The maximum follow-up period was 48 months and the minimum was 14 months with a mean value as 37.11 ± 5.14 months. Only 2 recurrences (3.3%) in group A and 4 cases (6.25%) in group B were seen. The final pain score per patient and the overall complication rate were higher in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The open preperitoneal repair offers the advantages of low recurrence rate and allows covering all potential defects with one piece of mesh and is far superior to the anterior approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12611000337976.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术仍然是最常见的普通外科手术之一,约15%的手术是针对复发性疝进行的。由于组织已经薄弱以及解剖结构模糊和变形,修复由此产生的复发性疝是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的目的是比较腹膜前修补术与前路无张力修补术治疗单侧复发性腹股沟疝的并发症和早期复发情况。

方法

本研究中的120例患者随机分为2个主要组;A组患者采用腹膜前修补术,B组患者采用传统的前路无张力修补术。主要终点是复发,次要终点是误工时间、术后疼痛、阴囊肿胀和伤口感染。

结果

A组和B组的平均住院时间分别为1.2天和4.7天,平均恢复工作时间分别为8.2天和11.2天,平均误工时间分别为9.4天和15.9天。最长随访期为48个月,最短为14个月,平均值为37.11±5.14个月。A组仅见2例复发(3.3%),B组见4例(6.25%)。B组患者的最终疼痛评分和总体并发症发生率更高。

结论

开放腹膜前修补术具有复发率低的优点,并且可以用一块补片覆盖所有潜在缺损,远优于前路修补术。

试验注册

ACTRN12611000337976。