• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

藏毛窦疾病改良偏中线闭合术

Modified off-midline closure of pilonidal sinus disease.

作者信息

Saber Aly

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Port-Fouad General Hospital, Port-Fouad, Port-Said, Egypt.

出版信息

N Am J Med Sci. 2014 May;6(5):210-4. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.132936.

DOI:10.4103/1947-2714.132936
PMID:24926445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4049053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous surgical procedures have been described for pilonidal sinus disease, but treatment failure and disease recurrence are frequent. Conventional off-midline flap closures have relatively favorable surgical outcomes, but relatively unfavorable cosmetic outcomes.

AIM

The author reported outcomes of a new simplified off-midline technique for closure of the defect after complete excision of the sinus tracts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients of both sexes were enrolled for modified D-shaped excisions were used to include all sinuses and their ramifications, with a simplified procedure to close the defect.

RESULTS

The overall wound infection rate was 12%, (12.2% for males and 11.1% for females). Wound disruption was necessitating laying the whole wound open and management as open technique. The overall wound disruption rate was 6%, (6.1% for males and 5.5% for females) and the overall recurrence rate was 7%.

CONCLUSION

Our simplified off-midline closure without flap appeared to be comparable to conventional off-midline closure with flap, in terms of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and recurrence. Advantages of the simplified procedure include potentially reduced surgery complexity, reduced surgery time, and improved cosmetic outcome.

摘要

背景

针对藏毛窦疾病已有多种手术方法被描述,但治疗失败和疾病复发很常见。传统的非中线皮瓣闭合术手术效果相对较好,但美容效果相对较差。

目的

作者报告了一种新的简化非中线技术在完全切除窦道后闭合缺损的效果。

患者与方法

纳入200例患者,采用改良D形切除术以切除所有窦道及其分支,并采用简化程序闭合缺损。

结果

总体伤口感染率为12%(男性为12.2%,女性为11.1%)。伤口裂开需要将整个伤口敞开并按开放技术处理。总体伤口裂开率为6%(男性为6.1%,女性为5.5%),总体复发率为7%。

结论

就伤口感染、伤口裂开和复发而言,我们的无皮瓣简化非中线闭合术似乎与传统的有皮瓣非中线闭合术相当。简化手术程序的优点包括可能降低手术复杂性、缩短手术时间和改善美容效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/59f2d3835453/NAJMS-6-210-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/db4af30ca42f/NAJMS-6-210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/980294dc0a9b/NAJMS-6-210-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/59f2d3835453/NAJMS-6-210-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/db4af30ca42f/NAJMS-6-210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/980294dc0a9b/NAJMS-6-210-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d806/4049053/59f2d3835453/NAJMS-6-210-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Modified off-midline closure of pilonidal sinus disease.藏毛窦疾病改良偏中线闭合术
N Am J Med Sci. 2014 May;6(5):210-4. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.132936.
2
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术治疗后一期愈合与二期愈合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub2.
3
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.如何修复骶尾部藏毛窦切除术后的手术缺损:一个两难问题。
J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630.
4
"Flag Excision and Flap" Procedure: a Novel Modification for Off-Midline Closure After Pilonidal Sinus Excision.“皮瓣切除与皮瓣”手术:藏毛窦切除术后中线外缝合的一种新型改良方法
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1191-5. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1241-8. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
5
Experience with pilonidal disease in children.儿童肛门部藏毛窦疾病的诊治经验。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
[Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate].藏毛窦切除术后一期中线缝合与高复发率相关。
Chirurg. 2003 May;74(5):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0616-8.
7
Surgical Practice Parameters for the Definitive Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Surgeons' Perspective.骶尾部藏毛窦疾病确定性治疗的外科实践参数:外科医生的观点
Cureus. 2023 May 25;15(5):e39480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39480. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Randomized prospective comparison of midline and off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.藏毛窦手术中中线与非中线闭合技术的随机前瞻性比较。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
9
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus.比较不同技术与一期缝合治疗慢性藏毛窦的随机对照试验的Meta分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Oct;18(10):863-72. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1149-5. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study.藏毛窦切除术后Limberg皮瓣一期伤口闭合与二期伤口愈合的多中心随机对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2057-x. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Laser treatment of pilonidal disease: a systematic review.激光治疗藏毛窦病:系统评价。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Mar;37(2):723-732. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03379-x. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Limberg flap and excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease, in terms of quality of life and complications.就生活质量和并发症而言,比较Limberg皮瓣手术与藏毛窦疾病切除及一期缝合术。
J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Nov;85(5):236-9. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.5.236. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
2
The influence of lifestyle (smoking and body mass index) on wound healing and long-term recurrence rate in 534 primary pilonidal sinus patients.生活方式(吸烟和体重指数)对 534 例原发性藏毛窦患者的伤口愈合和长期复发率的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1731-8. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
3
Open preperitoneal versus anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized study.
开放腹膜前修补术与前路修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的随机研究
BMC Surg. 2012 Oct 30;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-22.
4
Comparison of Limberg flap and tension-free primary closure during pilonidal sinus surgery.比较皮瓣推移术和无张力一期缝合术在肛门部藏毛窦手术中的应用。
World J Surg. 2012 Feb;36(2):431-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1333-y.
5
One day surgery for pilonidal disease.藏毛疾病的日间手术
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2011;112(10):572-4.
6
Ambulatory treatment of chronic pilonidal sinuses with lateral incision and primary suture.门诊治疗慢性藏毛窦的侧切开术和一期缝合术。
Can J Surg. 2011 Apr;54(2):78-82. doi: 10.1503/cjs.026309.
7
Simple day-case surgery for pilonidal sinus disease.单纯日间手术治疗藏毛窦疾病。
Br J Surg. 2011 Feb;98(2):198-209. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7292.
8
Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease: worthwhile option with an acceptable recurrence rate.切除并一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病:一种可行的选择,复发率可接受。
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;180(1):173-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0532-0. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
9
Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease.Limberg皮瓣与改良一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的随机对照研究
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.036.
10
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术治疗后一期愈合与二期愈合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.