Suppr超能文献

前列腺针吸活检处理:欧洲实验室实践调查。

Prostate needle biopsy processing: a survey of laboratory practice across Europe.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2013 Feb;66(2):120-3. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200993. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Abstract

AIM

To determine the degree of variation in the handling of prostate needle biopsies (PBNx) in laboratories across Europe.

METHODS

A web based survey was emailed to members of the European Network of Uropathology and the British Association of Urological Pathologists.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 241 laboratories in 15 countries. PNBx were generally taken by urologists (93.8%) or radiologists (23.7%) but in 8.7% were also taken by non-medical personnel such as radiographers, nurses or biomedical assistants. Of the responding laboratories, 40.8% received cores in separate containers, 42.3% processed one core/block, 54.2% examined three levels/block, 49.4% examined one H&E section/level and 56.1% retained spare sections for potential immunohistochemistry. Of the laboratories, 40.9% retained unstained spares for over a year while 36.2% discarded spares within 1 month of reporting. Only two (0.8%) respondents routinely performed immunohistochemistry on all PNBx. There were differences in laboratory practice between the UK and the rest of Europe (RE). Procurement of PNBx by non-medical personnel was more common in the UK. RE laboratories more commonly received each core in a separate container, processed one core/block, examined fewer levels/block and examined more H&E sections/level. RE laboratories also retained spares for potential immunohistochemistry less often and for shorter periods. Use of p63 as the sole basal cell marker was more common in RE.

CONCLUSIONS

There are marked differences in procurement, handling and processing of PNBx in laboratories across Europe. This data can help the development of best practice guidelines.

摘要

目的

确定欧洲各实验室前列腺针吸活检(PBNx)处理方法的差异程度。

方法

通过电子邮件向欧洲泌尿病理学会成员和英国泌尿病理学家协会成员发送了一份基于网络的调查。

结果

来自 15 个国家的 241 个实验室回复了调查。PBNx 通常由泌尿科医生(93.8%)或放射科医生(23.7%)采集,但也有 8.7%由放射技师、护士或生物医学助理等非医务人员采集。在回复的实验室中,40.8%将芯放在单独的容器中,42.3%处理一个芯/块,54.2%检查三个水平/块,49.4%检查一个 H&E 切片/水平,56.1%保留多余的切片以备潜在的免疫组织化学检查。40.9%的实验室保留未染色的多余样本超过一年,而 36.2%的实验室在报告后一个月内丢弃多余的样本。只有 2 名(0.8%)受访者例行对所有 PBNx 进行免疫组织化学检查。英国和欧洲其他地区(RE)的实验室实践存在差异。非医务人员采集 PBNx 在英国更为常见。RE 实验室更常见的做法是将每个芯放在单独的容器中,处理一个芯/块,检查较少的水平/块,检查更多的 H&E 切片/水平。RE 实验室也较少保留多余的切片以备潜在的免疫组织化学检查,且保留时间较短。在 RE 地区,p63 作为唯一的基底细胞标志物更为常见。

结论

欧洲各实验室在前列腺针吸活检的采集、处理和处理方面存在明显差异。这些数据有助于制定最佳实践指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验