Adler D A, Drake R E, Teague G B
Department of Psychiatry, Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA.
Compr Psychiatry. 1990 Mar-Apr;31(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(90)90016-l.
We assessed clinicians' practices in the process of personality assessment according to DSM-III axis II criteria. Forty-six clinicians rated personality traits and disorders on two versions of a clinical profile constructed to meet DSM-III axis II diagnoses of histrionic, narcissistic, borderline, and dependent, differing only in the sex of the patient. Clinicians tended to use only a single diagnostic category and to make significantly different personality attributions and diagnoses depending on the patient's sex. The sex of the clinician had no impact on the process. We conclude that clinicians viewing a case study tend to make global judgments about personality disorders and are influenced by the patient's gender, even when it has no known relevance. We interpret these findings in terms of critical set theory.
我们根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴II标准评估了临床医生在人格评估过程中的做法。46名临床医生根据两份临床资料对人格特质和障碍进行评分,这两份资料是为符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴II中关于表演型、自恋型、边缘型和依赖型人格障碍的诊断标准构建的,仅患者性别不同。临床医生往往只使用单一诊断类别,并且根据患者性别做出显著不同的人格归因和诊断。临床医生的性别对这一过程没有影响。我们得出结论,查看案例研究的临床医生倾向于对人格障碍做出整体判断,并受到患者性别的影响,即使性别与已知情况无关。我们根据关键集理论对这些发现进行了解释。