Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Vittorio Emanuele Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Blood Transfus. 2013 Jan;11(1):94-101. doi: 10.2450/2012.0004-12. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
Early identification of predictive factors of failure to mobilise CD34+ cells could enable rational use of plerixafor during first mobilisation, avoiding the need for a second mobilisation course. However, "on demand" administration of plerixafor needs to be driven by established parameters to avoid inappropriate use.
To address this issue, we studied the value of the peripheral blood CD34+ count, measured early (on days +10, +11, +12 and +13), in predicting the mobilisation outcome in the ensuing days. We retrospectively collected data from three Italian centres on 233 patients affected by multiple myeloma or lymphoma who underwent a first or second attempt at mobilisation with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. To assess the diagnostic value of peripheral blood white blood cell and CD34+ cell counts with respect to "mobilisation failure", we considered failed mobilisation as "disease" and the CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood, on a specific day, as a "diagnostic test". For various thresholds, we measured sensitivity, false positive rate, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) as well as the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC).
A CD34+ cell count <10 × 10(6)/L on day 13 had high sensitivity (1.00) and high specificity (1.00) for predicting subsequent mobilisation failure, with an AUC of 1.0. However, good prediction was also obtained using a lower threshold (CD34+ cell count: <6 × 10(6)/L) at an earlier time (day 12). The PPV of the day 13 threshold was 1.00 while that of the day 12 one was 0.87.
We propose that patients with <6 × 10(6)/L CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on day 12 and <10 × 10(6)/L on day 13 following mobilisation with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are candidates for "on demand" use of plerixafor, making the administration of this expensive agent more efficient and avoiding its inappropriate use.
早期识别不能动员 CD34+细胞的预测因素,可使理性使用plerixafor 在首次动员时,避免需要第二次动员课程。然而,“按需”plerixafor 的管理需要由既定参数驱动,以避免不适当的使用。
为了解决这个问题,我们研究了外周血 CD34+计数的价值,早期(第+10、+11、+12 和+13 天)测量,预测在接下来的日子里动员的结果。我们回顾性地从三个意大利中心收集了 233 例多发性骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤患者的数据,这些患者接受了环磷酰胺 4 g/m(2)和粒细胞集落刺激因子的首次或第二次动员尝试。为了评估外周血白细胞和 CD34+细胞计数对“动员失败”的诊断价值,我们认为动员失败是“疾病”,而在特定日子的外周血 CD34+细胞计数是“诊断测试”。对于不同的阈值,我们测量了灵敏度、假阳性率、特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)以及接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC)。
第 13 天 CD34+细胞计数<10×10(6)/L 对随后动员失败具有高灵敏度(1.00)和高特异性(1.00),AUC 为 1.0。然而,更早时间(第 12 天)使用较低的阈值(CD34+细胞计数:<6×10(6)/L)也可以进行很好的预测。第 13 天阈值的 PPV 为 1.00,而第 12 天的 PPV 为 0.87。
我们建议,外周血 CD34+细胞计数<6×10(6)/L 在第 12 天,<10×10(6)/L 在第 13 天的患者,用环磷酰胺 4 g/m(2)和粒细胞集落刺激因子动员后,适合“按需”使用 plerixafor,使这种昂贵药物的使用更有效,并避免其不适当使用。