Center for Hematologic Malignancies and Adult Blood & MarrowTransplant Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Apr;19(4):670-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Many institutions have adopted algorithms based on preapheresis circulating CD34+ cell counts to optimize the use of plerixafor. However, a circulating peripheral blood CD34+ cell threshold that predicts mobilization failure has not been defined. The superiority of plerixafor + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) over placebo + G-CSF for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection was shown for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a phase III, prospective, randomized, controlled study. The question remains as to which patients may benefit most from the use of plerixafor. In this post hoc retrospective analysis, mobilization outcomes were compared between the 2 treatment arms in patients stratified by peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (<5, 5 to 9, 10 to 14, 15 to 19, or ≥20 cells/μL) obtained before study treatment and apheresis. Compared with placebo plus G-CSF, plerixafor plus G-CSF significantly increased the peripheral blood CD34+ cells/μL over prior day levels in all 5 stratified groups. The probability of subsequent transplantation without a rescue mobilization was far greater in the plerixafor-treated patients for the lowest initial (day 4) peripheral blood CD34+ cells/μL groups (<5, 5 to 9, or 10 to 14). Engraftment and durability were the same for the 2 treatment groups for all strata, but the effect in the lower strata could be altered by the addition of cells from rescue mobilizations. These findings may provide insight into the optimal use of plerixafor in all patients undergoing stem cell mobilization.
许多机构已经采用了基于预处理循环 CD34+ 细胞计数的算法,以优化plerixafor 的使用。然而,尚未定义预测动员失败的循环外周血 CD34+ 细胞阈值。一项 III 期前瞻性随机对照研究表明,对于非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,plerixafor+粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)优于安慰剂+G-CSF 用于造血干细胞动员和采集。问题仍然是哪些患者可能最受益于 plerixafor 的使用。在这项事后回顾性分析中,根据研究治疗前和单采前获得的外周血 CD34+ 细胞计数(<5、5-9、10-14、15-19 或≥20 个/μL)将患者分层,比较了 2 个治疗组的动员结果。与安慰剂加 G-CSF 相比,plerixafor 加 G-CSF 在所有 5 个分层组中均显著增加了外周血 CD34+ 细胞/μL 与前一天水平相比。在初始(第 4 天)外周血 CD34+ 细胞/μL 最低的组(<5、5-9 或 10-14)中,plerixafor 治疗患者随后进行无挽救性动员移植的可能性要大得多。对于所有分层,2 个治疗组的植入和耐久性相同,但在较低分层中,挽救性动员的细胞添加可能会改变效果。这些发现可能为所有接受干细胞动员的患者提供关于 plerixafor 最佳使用的见解。