Phuah Sze-Yee, Looi Lai-Meng, Hassan Norhashimah, Rhodes Anthony, Dean Sarah, Taib Nur Aishah Mohd, Yip Cheng-Har, Teo Soo-Hwang
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 2;14(6):R142. doi: 10.1186/bcr3347.
Given that breast cancers in germline BRCA1 carriers are predominantly estrogen-negative and triple-negative, it has been suggested that women diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) younger than 50 years should be offered BRCA1 testing, regardless of family cancer characteristics. However, the predictive value of triple-negative breast cancer, when taken in the context of personal and family cancer characteristics, is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether TNBC is a predictor of germline BRCA1 mutations, in the context of multiple predictive factors.
Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed by Sanger sequencing and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis in 431 women from the Malaysian Breast Cancer Genetic Study, including 110 women with TNBC. Logistic regression was used to identify and to estimate the predictive strength of major determinants. Estrogen receptor (ER) and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) status were assessed and included in a modified Manchester scoring method.
Our study in an Asian series of TNBC patients demonstrated that 27 (24.5%) of 110 patients have germline mutations in BRCA1 (23 of 110) and BRCA2 (four of 110). We found that among women diagnosed with breast cancer aged 36 to 50 years but with no family history of breast or ovarian cancer, the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was similar in TNBC (8.5%) and non-TNBC patients (6.7%). By contrast, in women diagnosed with breast cancer, younger than 35 years, with no family history of these cancers, and in women with a family history of breast cancer, the prevalence of mutations was higher in TNBC compared with non-TNBC (28.0% and 9.9%; P = 0.045; and 42.1% and 14.2%; P < 0.0001, respectively]. Finally, we found that incorporation of estrogen-receptor and TNBC status improves the sensitivity of the Manchester Scoring method (42.9% to 64.3%), and furthermore, incorporation of PTEN status further improves sensitivity (42.9% to 85.7%).
We found that TNBC is an important criterion for highlighting women who may benefit from genetic testing, but that this may be most useful for women with early-onset breast cancer (35 years or younger) or with a family history of cancers. Furthermore, addition of TNBC and PTEN status improves the sensitivity of the Manchester scoring method and may be particularly important in the Asian context, where risk-assessment models underestimate the number of mutation carriers.
鉴于携带种系BRCA1的乳腺癌患者主要为雌激素受体阴性和三阴性,有人提出,无论家族癌症特征如何,对于50岁以下被诊断为三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的女性,均应进行BRCA1检测。然而,在个人和家族癌症特征的背景下,三阴性乳腺癌的预测价值尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在多种预测因素的背景下,确定TNBC是否为种系BRCA1突变的预测指标。
对来自马来西亚乳腺癌基因研究的431名女性进行了分析,其中包括110名TNBC女性,通过桑格测序和多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)分析BRCA1和BRCA2的种系突变。采用逻辑回归来识别和估计主要决定因素的预测强度。评估雌激素受体(ER)和磷酸酶及张力蛋白同源物(PTEN)状态,并纳入改良的曼彻斯特评分方法。
我们对一组亚洲TNBC患者的研究表明,110名患者中有27名(24.5%)携带BRCA1(110名中的23名)和BRCA2(110名中的4名)种系突变。我们发现,在36至50岁被诊断为乳腺癌但无乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史的女性中,TNBC患者(8.5%)和非TNBC患者(6.7%)的BRCA1和BRCA2突变患病率相似。相比之下,在35岁以下被诊断为乳腺癌且无这些癌症家族史的女性以及有乳腺癌家族史的女性中,TNBC患者的突变患病率高于非TNBC患者(分别为28.0%和9.9%;P = 0.045;以及42.1%和14.2%;P < 0.0001)。最后,我们发现纳入雌激素受体和TNBC状态可提高曼彻斯特评分方法的敏感性(从42.9%提高到64.3%),此外,纳入PTEN状态可进一步提高敏感性(从42.9%提高到85.7%)。
我们发现TNBC是突出可能从基因检测中获益的女性的重要标准,但这可能对患有早发性乳腺癌(35岁或以下)或有癌症家族史的女性最为有用。此外,增加TNBC和PTEN状态可提高曼彻斯特评分方法的敏感性,在亚洲背景下可能尤为重要,因为风险评估模型低估了突变携带者的数量。