Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Apr;29(4):765-75. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0146-x. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of various cardiovascular screening tools in asymptomatic subjects with intermediate-to-high risk Framingham risk score (FRS). In addition, we also investigated whether carotid artery study could further add incremental value beyond metabolic abnormality and inflammatory marker in this issue. 1,200 asymptomatic subjects who underwent health evaluation were recruited in our study. FRS was calculated in all participants based on clinical variables, body surface electrocardiography, medical histories, and life styles. Metabolic scores, serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) level and carotid artery study in assessing intima-media-thickness (CIMT) and plaque were all obtained and compared to FRS. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy was then conducted among these different tools aiming at a more efficient screen in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS. Of all, 1,101 participants (mean age 50.6 ± 10.4, 38.6 % women) were finally entered in our study after exclusion of known cardiovascular diseases. By utilizing common carotid IMT (CCIMT) equal or larger than 1 mm, best specificity (98.27, 95 % CI 97.24-98.99) was achieved in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS subject. The most optimal cut-off in identifying intermediate-to-high FRS for metabolic scores, hs-CRP and CCIMT was 2, 0.101 mg/dL and 0.65 mm, respectively. Both receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratio tests showed that information provided by carotid artery study further showed significant incremental value when superimposed on metabolic scores and hs-CRP (all p < 0.05) in screening intermediate-to-high FRS subjects. Though diagnostic accuracy may differ to some degree by using different cut-off values, a low metabolic score seemed to have the best sensitivity with abnormal CCIMT yielded highest specificity in screening a subject with future cardiovascular risks. Carotid artery study added significant clinical incremental value in discriminating projected risk beyond metabolic scores and hs-CRP.
比较不同心血管筛查工具在 Framingham 风险评分(FRS)中危至高风险的无症状患者中的诊断准确性。此外,我们还研究了颈动脉研究在这个问题上是否可以在代谢异常和炎症标志物之外提供额外的增量价值。我们的研究纳入了 1200 名接受健康评估的无症状患者。根据临床变量、体表心电图、病史和生活方式,为所有参与者计算了 FRS。获得了代谢评分、血清高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平以及颈动脉研究的内膜中层厚度(CIMT)和斑块,并与 FRS 进行了比较。然后,比较了这些不同工具的诊断准确性,目的是更有效地筛选出 FRS 处于中高危的人群。在排除已知心血管疾病后,共有 1101 名参与者(平均年龄 50.6±10.4 岁,38.6%为女性)最终进入了我们的研究。利用颈总动脉 IMT(CCIMT)等于或大于 1mm,在识别 FRS 处于中高危的患者时,可获得最佳的特异性(98.27%,95%CI97.24-98.99)。在识别代谢评分、hs-CRP 和 CCIMT 中处于中高危 FRS 的最佳截断值分别为 2、0.101mg/dL 和 0.65mm。受试者工作特征曲线和似然比检验均表明,在筛查 FRS 处于中高危的患者时,颈动脉研究提供的信息在叠加代谢评分和 hs-CRP 后具有显著的增量价值(均 P<0.05)。虽然使用不同的截断值可能会导致诊断准确性在一定程度上有所不同,但低代谢评分似乎具有最佳的敏感性,而异常的 CCIMT 则具有最高的特异性,可以筛查出未来有心血管风险的患者。颈动脉研究在区分代谢评分和 hs-CRP 之外的预测风险方面提供了显著的临床增量价值。