Wandel J C
Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.
J Prof Nurs. 1990 Jan-Feb;6(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80189-9.
Postural or orthostatic vital signs, although frequently used in many clinical settings to aid in the diagnosis of fluid volume disturbance, can be a source of confusion. Practitioners often have questions about how to perform the test and may be uncertain about what results mean in various clinical situations. Some of this confusion is reflected in the literature, where studies on normal orthostatic responses seem to contradict clinically used parameters of "normal," and where very few studies appear on evaluating unusual responses as indicators of patients' fluid volume status. A review of existing literature is presented, in which relevant data are reviewed in terms of their impact on the use of this clinical sign. Recommendations regarding the use of the orthostatic test are given.
体位性或直立性生命体征虽然在许多临床环境中经常用于辅助诊断液体容量紊乱,但可能会造成混淆。从业者常常对如何进行该测试存在疑问,并且可能不确定在各种临床情况下结果意味着什么。这种混淆在文献中有所体现,关于正常直立反应的研究似乎与临床使用的“正常”参数相矛盾,而且很少有研究评估异常反应作为患者液体容量状态的指标。本文对现有文献进行了综述,其中根据相关数据对该临床体征使用的影响进行了回顾。给出了关于直立试验使用的建议。