• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价问责制医疗照顾组织的形成、实施和绩效的框架。

A framework for evaluating the formation, implementation, and performance of accountable care organizations.

机构信息

Center for Population Health, Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2368-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0544.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0544
PMID:23129666
Abstract

The implementation of accountable care organizations (ACOs), a new health care payment and delivery model designed to improve care and lower costs, is proceeding rapidly. We build on our experience tracking early ACOs to identify the major factors-such as contract characteristics; structure, capabilities, and activities; and local context-that would be likely to influence ACO formation, implementation, and performance. We then propose how an ACO evaluation program could be structured to guide policy makers and payers in improving the design of ACO contracts, while providing insights for providers on approaches to care transformation that are most likely to be successful in different contexts. We also propose key activities to support evaluation of ACOs in the near term, including tracking their formation, developing a set of performance measures across all ACOs and payers, aggregating those performance data, conducting qualitative and quantitative research, and coordinating different evaluation activities.

摘要

责任医疗组织(ACO)的实施正在迅速推进,这是一种新的医疗保健支付和交付模式,旨在改善医疗服务和降低成本。我们借鉴了我们在跟踪早期 ACO 方面的经验,以确定可能影响 ACO 形成、实施和绩效的主要因素,如合同特征、结构、能力和活动以及当地背景。然后,我们提出了如何构建 ACO 评估计划,以指导政策制定者和支付者改进 ACO 合同的设计,同时为提供者提供有关在不同情况下最有可能成功的护理转型方法的见解。我们还提出了支持 ACO 近期评估的关键活动,包括跟踪其形成、为所有 ACO 和支付者制定一套绩效衡量标准、汇总这些绩效数据、进行定性和定量研究以及协调不同的评估活动。

相似文献

1
A framework for evaluating the formation, implementation, and performance of accountable care organizations.评价问责制医疗照顾组织的形成、实施和绩效的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2368-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0544.
2
Insights from transformations under way at four Brookings-Dartmouth accountable care organization pilot sites.从四个布鲁金斯-达特茅斯负责医疗组织试点项目的转型中获得的见解。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2395-406. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1219.
3
Analysis of early accountable care organizations defines patient, structural, cost, and quality-of-care characteristics.早期责任医疗组织分析确定了患者、结构、成本及医疗质量特征。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):95-102. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1063.
4
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts.四个州的医疗补助管理式医疗组织:实施与早期影响。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):583-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12386. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
5
The promise and peril of accountable care for vulnerable populations: a framework for overcoming obstacles.有责任的医疗照顾对弱势人群的承诺和危险:克服障碍的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1777-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0490.
6
Characteristics of Rural Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) – A Survey of Medicare ACOs with Rural Presence.农村责任医疗组织(ACO)的特征——对有农村业务的医疗保险ACO的一项调查。
Rural Policy Brief. 2015 May 1(2015 8):1-4.
7
How the center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation should test accountable care organizations.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心应如何测试责任医疗组织。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jul;29(7):1293-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0453.
8
Accountable care organizations and the allergist: challenges and opportunities.责任医疗组织与过敏科医生:挑战与机遇。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.09.020.
9
Accountable care organizations and ESRD: the time has come.负责照护的医疗机构组织和终末期肾病:是时候了。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 May;59(5):724-33. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
Many accountable care organizations are now up and running, if not off to the races.许多责任医疗组织如今已开始运作,即便尚未全速起跑。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2363-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1144.

引用本文的文献

1
Does vertical integration increase the costs for primary care inpatients? Evidence from a national pilot programme in China.垂直整合会增加基层医疗住院患者的费用吗?来自中国一项全国性试点项目的证据。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;82(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01378-2.
2
Building alternative payment models in health care.构建医疗保健领域的替代支付模式。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jun 14;4:1235913. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1235913. eCollection 2024.
3
Association between physician-hospital integration and inpatient care delivery in accountable care organizations: An instrumental variable analysis.
医疗责任组织中医生与医院整合和住院医疗服务提供之间的关联:一项工具变量分析。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14311. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14311. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
County medical community, medical insurance package payment, and hierarchical diagnosis and treatment-Empirical analysis of the impact of the pilot project of compact county medical communities in Sichuan Province.县域医疗共同体、医保打包付费、分级诊疗——四川省紧密型县域医共体试点项目的影响实证分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 5;19(4):e0297340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297340. eCollection 2024.
5
Value-based payment models and management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.基于价值的支付模式与新诊断前列腺癌的管理。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6810. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6810. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Practice Pattern Variation in Adoption of New and Evolving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures.新的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗方法的应用实践模式差异。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 4;2023:2488045. doi: 10.1155/2023/2488045. eCollection 2023.
7
Using a mixed-effect model with a parameter-space of heterogenous dimension to evaluate whether accountable care organizations are associated with greater uniformity across constituent practices.采用具有异质维度参数空间的混合效应模型来评估问责制医疗组织是否与组成实践之间更大的一致性相关。
Stat Med. 2022 Sep 20;41(21):4215-4226. doi: 10.1002/sim.9506. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
8
Assessing the effect of a regional integrated care model over ten years using quality indicators based on claims data - the basic statistical methodology of the INTEGRAL project.基于索赔数据的质量指标评估区域整合照护模式十年效果——INTEGRAL 项目的基本统计方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07573-7.
9
Health Behavior Change Programs in Primary Care and Community Practices for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Risk Factor Management Among Midlife and Older Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.《中老年人群心血管疾病预防和危险因素管理的初级保健和社区实践中的健康行为改变计划:美国心脏协会的科学声明》。
Circulation. 2021 Dec 14;144(24):e533-e549. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001026. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
10
FQHC Designation and Safety Net Patient Revenue Associated with Primary Care Practice Capabilities for Access and Quality.初级保健能力与 FQHC 指定和安全网患者收入及医疗质量的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):2922-2928. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06746-0. Epub 2021 Aug 3.