• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种为医院医师提供反馈的新工具,以改善跨专业团队合作并推进患者护理。

A new tool to give hospitalists feedback to improve interprofessional teamwork and advance patient care.

机构信息

American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2485-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0611.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0611
PMID:23129679
Abstract

Teamwork is a vital skill for health care professionals, but the fragmented systems within which they work frequently do not recognize or support good teamwork. The American Board of Internal Medicine has developed and is testing the Teamwork Effectiveness Assessment Module (TEAM), a tool for physicians to evaluate how they perform as part of an interprofessional patient care team. The assessment provides hospitalist physicians with feedback data drawn from their own work of caring for patients, in a way that is intended to support immediate, concrete change efforts to improve the quality of patient care. Our approach demonstrates the value of looking at teamwork in the real world of health care-that is, as it occurs in the actual contexts in which providers work together to care for patients. The assessment of individual physicians' teamwork competencies may play a role in the larger effort to bring disparate health professions together in a system that supports and rewards a team approach in hope of improving patient care.

摘要

团队合作对于医疗保健专业人员来说是一项至关重要的技能,但他们工作所在的碎片化系统通常无法识别或支持良好的团队合作。美国内科医师学会已经开发并正在测试团队有效性评估模块(TEAM),这是一种供医生评估他们作为跨专业患者护理团队成员表现的工具。该评估为住院医师提供了来自他们照顾患者工作的反馈数据,旨在支持立即采取具体的变革措施,以提高患者护理质量。我们的方法展示了在医疗保健的实际环境中观察团队合作的价值,即,在提供者共同照顾患者的实际背景下进行观察。评估个别医生的团队合作能力可能在将不同的健康专业人员聚集在一个支持和奖励团队方法的系统中发挥作用,以期改善患者护理。

相似文献

1
A new tool to give hospitalists feedback to improve interprofessional teamwork and advance patient care.一种为医院医师提供反馈的新工具,以改善跨专业团队合作并推进患者护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2485-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0611.
2
There is no "i" in teamwork in the patient-centered medical home: defining teamwork competencies for academic practice.在以患者为中心的医疗之家,团队合作中没有“我”:为学术实践定义团队合作能力。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):585-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b0289.
3
How hospitalists work to pull healthcare teams together.住院医师如何努力凝聚医疗团队。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):933-47. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2015-0008.
4
Assessing interprofessional teamwork: pilot test of a new assessment module for practicing physicians.评估跨专业团队合作:针对执业医师的新评估模块的试点测试。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Winter;35(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/chp.21267.
5
Helping primary care teams emerge through a quality improvement program.通过质量改进计划帮助基层医疗团队的发展。
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):204-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms056. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
6
Palliative care program stresses teamwork.姑息治疗项目强调团队合作。
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2007 Oct;14(10):117-9.
7
How physicians perceive hospitalist services after implementation: anticipation vs reality.实施后医生对住院医师服务的看法:预期与现实
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2330-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2330.
8
The evolution and future of hospital medicine.医院医学的发展与未来。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2008 Oct;75(5):418-23. doi: 10.1002/msj.20078.
9
Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction.城市教学医院住院医师的地理分配:可行性及其对效率和医疗服务提供者满意度的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Oct;45(4):135-142. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1353884. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
A conceptual framework for interprofessional and co-managed care.跨专业与共同管理式护理的概念框架。
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10):929-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850b4b.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Impact of Workplace Satisfaction, Leadership, and Career Development on Employee Retention in Hospitals.探索工作满意度、领导力和职业发展对医院员工留任意愿的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):e81493. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81493. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparative Analysis of Patient Satisfaction Surveys-A Crucial Role in Raising the Standard of Healthcare Services.患者满意度调查的比较分析——提高医疗服务标准的关键作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 1;11(21):2878. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212878.
3
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Inpatient Care Provided by Hospitalists and Nonhospitalists in South Korea.
韩国的住院医生和非住院医生提供的住院护理的患者满意度比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158101.
4
Development of a national medical leadership competency framework: the Dutch approach.制定国家医学领导力能力框架:荷兰的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1800-y.
5
Huddling for High-Performing Teams.高效团队的聚能协作。
Fed Pract. 2018 Sep;35(9):16-22.
6
Reducing Interdisciplinary Communication Failures Through Secure Text Messaging: A Quality Improvement Project.通过安全短信减少跨学科沟通失误:一项质量改进项目。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018 Feb 6;3(1):e053. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000053. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb.
7
Indicators and Measurement Tools for Health Systems Integration: A Knowledge Synthesis.卫生系统整合的指标与测量工具:一项知识综合研究
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Nov 13;17(6):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3931.
8
Competitive Advantage of MBA for Physician Executives: A Systematic Literature Review.《医生型管理者攻读 MBA 的竞争优势:系统文献回顾》。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1655-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4370-3.
9
Integrative Review of Technology to Support Communication With Parents of Infants in the NICU.支持与新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)婴儿家长沟通的技术综合综述。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 May-Jun;46(3):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards.脱轨:内科病房医师与其他专业之间沟通与协作的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 25;13:494. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-494.