Beltran Marcelo A, Mendez Pedro E, Barrera Rodrigo E, Contreras Mario A, Wilson Christian S, Cortes Victor J, Cruces Karina S
Department of Surgery, Emergency Unit, Universidad Catolica Del Norte, Hospital De La Serena, La Serena, Chile.
Indian J Surg. 2009 Oct;71(5):265-72. doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0074-8. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
To compare the performance for the prediction of perforated appendicitis of total bilirubin versus C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count, the time period of symptoms' evolution, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
Prospective observational study, applying receiver operating characteristics curve analysis to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the tested variables.
The period of symptom's evolution was prolonged (105.2 ± 79.3 hours vs. 38.6 ± 17.5 hours), and CRP levels were higher in perforated appendicitis (176 ± 82.6 mg/l vs. 80 ± 76 mg/l). Most patients with perforated appendicitis had a SIRS score higher than 3 points. CRP (>76.7 mg/l), the time period of symptoms' evolution (>34.5 hours), and SIRS (3 points or more), were the best cutoff values to predict perforated appendicitis.
Perforated appendicitis may be suspected based on CRP, SIRS and the time period of symptoms' evolution. We do not recommend the use of total bilirubin to predict perforation in appendicitis.
比较总胆红素与C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数、症状演变时间以及全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)对穿孔性阑尾炎的预测性能。
前瞻性观察研究,应用受试者工作特征曲线分析来比较所测试变量的敏感性和特异性。
穿孔性阑尾炎患者的症状演变时间延长(105.2±79.3小时对38.6±17.5小时),且CRP水平更高(176±82.6mg/l对80±76mg/l)。大多数穿孔性阑尾炎患者的SIRS评分高于3分。CRP(>76.7mg/l)、症状演变时间(>34.5小时)以及SIRS(3分及以上)是预测穿孔性阑尾炎的最佳临界值。
可根据CRP、SIRS以及症状演变时间怀疑穿孔性阑尾炎。我们不建议使用总胆红素来预测阑尾炎穿孔。