• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃纤维铸造材料的力学性能及其临床相关性比较。

A comparison of the mechanical properties of fiberglass cast materials and their clinical relevance.

作者信息

Berman A T, Parks B G

机构信息

School of Medicine, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199003000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00005131-199003000-00015
PMID:2313436
Abstract

The mechanical properties of five synthetic fiberglass casting materials were evaluated and compared with the properties of plaster of Paris. Two of the tests were designed to bear clinical relevance and the third to determine intrinsic material properties. The effect of water on strength degradation was also evaluated. It was found that the synthetics as a group are far superior to plaster of Paris in all methods of testing and that, among the synthetics, KCast Tack Free, Deltalite "S", and KCast Improved were the stronger materials. Clinically, the most important results are that the synthetics attain their relatively high strength in a much shorter time frame than does plaster of Paris, and retain 70-90% of their strength after being immersed in water and allowed to dry.

摘要

对五种合成玻璃纤维铸造材料的机械性能进行了评估,并与巴黎石膏的性能进行了比较。其中两项测试旨在具有临床相关性,第三项测试旨在确定材料的固有特性。还评估了水对强度降解的影响。结果发现,作为一个整体,合成材料在所有测试方法中都远优于巴黎石膏,并且在合成材料中,KCast Tack Free、Deltalite "S" 和 KCast Improved 是强度较高的材料。在临床上,最重要的结果是,合成材料在比巴黎石膏短得多的时间内达到其相对较高的强度,并且在浸入水中并干燥后仍保留其强度的70-90%。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the mechanical properties of fiberglass cast materials and their clinical relevance.玻璃纤维铸造材料的力学性能及其临床相关性比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199003000-00015.
2
Hybrid casts: a comparison of different casting materials.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999 Jun;99(6):311-2. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.1999.99.6.311.
3
Mechanical properties and material characteristics of orthopaedic casting material.
J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/00005131-198903010-00011.
4
Cast changes: synthetic versus plaster.
Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Jul-Aug;23(4):422, 425-7.
5
A comparison of some casting materials.一些铸造材料的比较。
Vet Rec. 1985 Jul 20;117(3):55-8. doi: 10.1136/vr.117.3.55.
6
Skin surface pressure beneath an above-the-knee cast: plaster casts compared with fiberglass casts.膝上石膏下的皮肤表面压力:石膏绷带与玻璃纤维绷带的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Apr;79(4):565-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199704000-00013.
7
Fiberglass versus plaster casts. How to choose between them.玻璃纤维石膏与传统石膏。如何在两者之间进行选择。
Postgrad Med. 1989 Oct;86(5):71-2, 74. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1989.11704430.
8
Properties of a hybrid plaster-fibreglass cast.混合石膏-玻璃纤维石膏管型的特性。
Can J Surg. 2000 Oct;43(5):365-7.
9
A Biomechanical Evaluation of Casting Technique and Cast Core Size Effect.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2023;43(10):e816-e822. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002517. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
10
Comparative study on stiffness properties of WOODCAST and conventional casting materials.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Aug;37(4):336-9. doi: 10.1177/0309364612465885. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of various cast covers in the pediatric population.各种铸型覆盖物在儿科人群中的有效性。
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Mar 29;7:100028. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100028. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Short arm splints for wrist stabilization: A mechanical material test and cadaveric radiography study.用于手腕稳定的短臂夹板:一项机械材料测试和尸体放射摄影研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 26;11(4):e70065. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70065. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Revolution in orthopedic immobilization materials: A comprehensive review.
骨科固定材料的革命:全面综述
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 16;9(3):e13640. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13640. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Comparison of Water Absorption and Drying in Distal Radius Fracture Casts and Orthoses.比较桡骨远端骨折外固定架和矫形器的吸水性和干燥性。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Sep 13;5(9):e21.00115. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00115.
5
Comparison of two different ways to apply a circular plaster cast for distal radius fractures: biomechanical study.比较两种不同方法在桡骨远端骨折中应用环形石膏夹板的效果:生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 30;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02256-1.
6
Test of Strength: Figure-of-Eight versus Spiral Wrapping Technique for Fiberglass Casts.强度测试:用于玻璃纤维石膏的“8”字形与螺旋缠绕技术对比
Cureus. 2020 Apr 26;12(4):e7843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7843.
7
Commonly used adjuvants (liquid soap, foam sanitizer, or ultrasound gel) do not improve strength or curing time of fiberglass cast material.常用的赋形剂(液体肥皂、泡沫消毒剂或超声耦合剂)不会增强玻璃纤维增强材料的强度或固化时间。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 30;14(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1202-1.
8
Physical and Clinical Evaluation of Hip Spica Cast applied with Three-slab Technique using Fibreglass Material.使用玻璃纤维材料采用三夹板技术应用髋人字石膏的体格检查与临床评估
Malays Orthop J. 2016 Nov;10(3):17-20. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1611.008.
9
Lower limb intracast pressures generated by different types of immobilisation casts.不同类型固定石膏产生的下肢石膏内压力
World J Orthop. 2017 Feb 18;8(2):170-177. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.170.
10
Casting: Pearls and pitfalls learned while caring for children's fractures.石膏固定:在儿童骨折护理中积累的经验与教训
World J Orthop. 2016 Sep 18;7(9):539-45. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.539.