Ekanayake Chathushika, Gamage J C P H, Mendis P, Weerasinghe P
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, 10400 Sri Lanka.
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia.
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 16;9(3):e13640. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13640. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Immobilization material has slowly revolutionized since 3000 BCE from traditional plaster to modern day synthetic casting tape, including other sustainable immobilization material. This revolution is driven by the search for superior casting material that possesses excellent mechanical and load-bearing properties, non-toxicity, excellent healing rates, patient satisfaction and eco friendliness. Even though the new materials have been evolved, the traditional plaster still remains a material of choice owing to its excellent skin conformability, low cost and availability. This paper aims to present a comprehensive review on the technique of immobilization, existing orthopedic immobilization (casting and splinting) materials and complications associated with immobilization (mainly casting) which aimed to assist the medical practitioners and researchers in casting material improvements and selection. Nine immobilization materials are comprehensively discussed for their desirable properties, drawbacks and the required improvements to the composition, along with the most common cast complications ranging from superficial pressure sores to compartment syndrome and Deep Vein Thrombosis. . This paper identifies that among the existing material, plaster casts are still highly used due to their cost benefit and the ability to fit patients into full body casts, while synthetic material is too rigid and has a higher probability of causing complications such as compartment syndrome and deep vein thrombosis. Patients show a higher preference in using synthetic casts for short term and body extremity casting as they are comparatively more comfortable. New materials such as Woodcast shows good promise but their mechanical characteristics and comfort are yet to be critically analyzed. However, there exists an imminent requirement to upgrade existing material as well as to introduce novel promising sustainable material for long term immobilization.
自公元前3000年以来,固定材料已从传统石膏缓慢演变为现代合成铸型绷带,还包括其他可持续的固定材料。这场变革是由对优质铸型材料的追求所驱动的,这种材料需具备出色的机械性能和承重性能、无毒、愈合率高、患者满意度高以及生态友好性。尽管新材料不断涌现,但传统石膏因其出色的皮肤贴合性、低成本和易获取性,仍然是一种首选材料。本文旨在对固定技术、现有的骨科固定(铸型和夹板)材料以及与固定(主要是铸型)相关的并发症进行全面综述,以协助医学从业者和研究人员改进和选择铸型材料。本文全面讨论了九种固定材料的理想特性、缺点以及对其成分所需的改进,同时还介绍了从浅表压疮到骨筋膜室综合征和深静脉血栓形成等最常见的铸型并发症。本文指出,在现有材料中,石膏铸型因其成本效益以及能够为患者制作全身铸型而仍被广泛使用,而合成材料过于坚硬,导致骨筋膜室综合征和深静脉血栓形成等并发症的可能性更高。患者在短期和肢体铸型中更倾向于使用合成铸型,因为它们相对更舒适。像Woodcast这样的新材料显示出良好的前景,但其机械特性和舒适度仍有待严格分析。然而,迫切需要升级现有材料,并引入有前景的新型可持续材料用于长期固定。