Hood Nancy E, Ferketich Amy K, Klein Elizabeth G, Wewers Mary Ellen, Pirie Phyllis
The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Health Behavior & Health Promotion, Columbus, OH 48106-1248, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1075-83. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts246. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
Mandatory smoke-free policies in subsidized, multiunit housing (MUH) may decrease secondhand smoke exposure in households with the highest rates of exposure. Ideally, policies should be based on a strong understanding of factors affecting support for smoke-free policies in the target population to maximize effectiveness.
A face-to-face survey was conducted from August to October 2011 using a stratified random sample of private subsidized housing units in Columbus, OH, without an existing smoke-free policy (n = 301, 64% response rate). Lease holders were asked to report individual, social, and environmental factors hypothesized to be related to support for smoke-free policies. Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify factors independently associated with policy support.
Most tenants supported smoke-free policies in common areas (82.7%), half supported policies inside units (54.5%), and one third supported a ban outside the building (36.3%). Support for smoke-free policies in units and outdoors was more common among nonsmokers than smokers (71.5% vs. 35.7%, p < .001 and 46.2% vs. 25.4%, p < .001, respectively). Several individual and social, but no environmental, factors were independently associated with policy support. Smokers who intended to quit within 6 months or less were more likely than other smokers to support in-unit policies (45.3% vs. 21.1%; p = .003).
More than half of subsidized MUH tenants supported smoke-free policies inside their units. Strategies to address individual- and social-level barriers to behavior change should be implemented in parallel with smoke-free policies. Policies should be evaluated with objective measures to determine their effectiveness.
在有补贴的多单元住房(MUH)中实施强制无烟政策,可能会减少二手烟暴露率最高的家庭中的二手烟暴露。理想情况下,政策应基于对影响目标人群对无烟政策支持因素的深入理解,以实现最大效果。
2011年8月至10月进行了一项面对面调查,采用分层随机抽样方法,选取俄亥俄州哥伦布市没有现行无烟政策的私人补贴住房单元(n = 301,回应率64%)。向租户询问了假设与支持无烟政策相关的个人、社会和环境因素。使用多元逻辑回归模型确定与政策支持独立相关的因素。
大多数租户支持在公共区域实施无烟政策(82.7%),一半租户支持在单元内实施政策(54.5%),三分之一租户支持在建筑物外实施禁令(36.3%)。非吸烟者比吸烟者更普遍支持在单元内和户外实施无烟政策(分别为71.5%对35.7%,p <.001;46.2%对25.4%,p <.001)。几个个人和社会因素,但没有环境因素,与政策支持独立相关。打算在6个月或更短时间内戒烟的吸烟者比其他吸烟者更有可能支持单元内政策(45.3%对21.1%;p =.003)。
超过一半的补贴型多单元住房租户支持在其单元内实施无烟政策。应在实施无烟政策的同时,并行实施应对个人和社会层面行为改变障碍的策略。政策应通过客观指标进行评估,以确定其有效性。